From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4 REPOST] OF infrastructure for SPI devices Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:49:28 -0700 Message-ID: <200807271449.28472.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <20080725072549.8485.90723.stgit@trillian.secretlab.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, jonsmirl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org To: spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080725072549.8485.90723.stgit-8FIgwK2HfyId2tlXD8uQ6/kpB+XfMlBf@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: spi-devel-general-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: spi-devel-general-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On Friday 25 July 2008, Grant Likely wrote: > I don't know what to do with these patches. =A0I'd really like to see them > in .27, and now that akpm has cleared his queue, the prerequisite patch > has been merged so they are ready to go in. =A0However, even though there > has been favourable reception on the SPI and linuxppc lists for these > changes I don't have any acks from anybody yet. > = > David, can you please reply on if you are okay with these patches > getting merged? =A0If so, do you want me to merge them via my tree, or > do you want to pick them up? OK ... to recap, #1 and #3 are OF-specific, I'll be agnostic. If other OF folk think it's OK, great. Some cleanup was needed for #2, but it was basically ok ... I'd like to see the final version, and if it goes via an OF push that's OK by me. (Though I'd like to see that change make it into 2.6.27 regardless, so let me know.) And #4 isn't quite cooked yet. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great priz= es Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=3D100&url=3D/ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp116.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp116.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.64.89]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13CEFDDED7 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:49:30 +1000 (EST) From: David Brownell To: spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4 REPOST] OF infrastructure for SPI devices Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:49:28 -0700 References: <20080725072549.8485.90723.stgit@trillian.secretlab.ca> In-Reply-To: <20080725072549.8485.90723.stgit@trillian.secretlab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200807271449.28472.david-b@pacbell.net> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Friday 25 July 2008, Grant Likely wrote: > I don't know what to do with these patches.  I'd really like to see them > in .27, and now that akpm has cleared his queue, the prerequisite patch > has been merged so they are ready to go in.  However, even though there > has been favourable reception on the SPI and linuxppc lists for these > changes I don't have any acks from anybody yet. > > David, can you please reply on if you are okay with these patches > getting merged?  If so, do you want me to merge them via my tree, or > do you want to pick them up? OK ... to recap, #1 and #3 are OF-specific, I'll be agnostic. If other OF folk think it's OK, great. Some cleanup was needed for #2, but it was basically ok ... I'd like to see the final version, and if it goes via an OF push that's OK by me. (Though I'd like to see that change make it into 2.6.27 regardless, so let me know.) And #4 isn't quite cooked yet. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759451AbYG0Vti (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:49:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758579AbYG0Vta (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:49:30 -0400 Received: from smtp116.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.89]:35949 "HELO smtp116.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1757614AbYG0Vta (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:49:30 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=2rndQQRu8S+E/fru9HVMQsGzHZZVgcwfs1HyfX1eqYhDfUgp15VFbGCVydURGIVhvdv38gdPdTeUl7WC+5LyKbTFuTY85QgDu5AiOejp3vNIjtiwFrksXz/d/jvSRL5f56adoLRQyapcQyl9eZL2qsnxy41ScR6CLWAPikPb8RY= ; X-YMail-OSG: mKsj87sVM1m8LPEwLlidZDN27hNrCQi1g4S7DxdZd39VnuI28_loqKGiiaRE_P_budga9MZ8GIesT0gNCpYJrHnUIRUFDpeXCV6g5yLjAECPgR_7ULGEQNuM14W1bRIeREo- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: David Brownell To: spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4 REPOST] OF infrastructure for SPI devices Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:49:28 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Grant Likely , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, jonsmirl@gmail.com References: <20080725072549.8485.90723.stgit@trillian.secretlab.ca> In-Reply-To: <20080725072549.8485.90723.stgit@trillian.secretlab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807271449.28472.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 25 July 2008, Grant Likely wrote: > I don't know what to do with these patches.  I'd really like to see them > in .27, and now that akpm has cleared his queue, the prerequisite patch > has been merged so they are ready to go in.  However, even though there > has been favourable reception on the SPI and linuxppc lists for these > changes I don't have any acks from anybody yet. > > David, can you please reply on if you are okay with these patches > getting merged?  If so, do you want me to merge them via my tree, or > do you want to pick them up? OK ... to recap, #1 and #3 are OF-specific, I'll be agnostic. If other OF folk think it's OK, great. Some cleanup was needed for #2, but it was basically ok ... I'd like to see the final version, and if it goes via an OF push that's OK by me. (Though I'd like to see that change make it into 2.6.27 regardless, so let me know.) And #4 isn't quite cooked yet.