From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, travis@sgi.com,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, dsterba@suse.cz, jkosina@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [build error] drivers/char/pcmcia/ipwireless/hardware.c:571: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct ipw_network'
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:29:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080728222925.GA21012@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080728152056.8e83c4ec.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:06:31 +0200
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> >
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >
> > > drivers/char/pcmcia/ipwireless/hardware.c:571: error: invalid use of
> > > undefined type 'struct ipw_network'
> > >
> > > http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Mon_Jul_28_23_36_20_CEST_2008.bad
> > >
> > > probably due to a string of commits to that file from today.
> >
> > hm, has this version of the driver ever been built successfully? Because
> > struct ipw_network is defined in network.c [only], and then used in
> > hardware.c.
> >
> > It could be changed to void * if the structure wasnt relied on by:
> >
> > const int min_capacity =
> > ipwireless_ppp_mru(hw->network + 2);
> >
> > so changing it to void * would break this part of the code.
> >
> > furthermore, what does that "hw->network + 2" mean? It points into
> > la-la-land AFAICS, because it's initialized as:
> >
> > struct ipw_network *network =
> > kzalloc(sizeof(struct ipw_network), GFP_ATOMIC);
> >
> > and then written into hw->network via:
> >
> > ipwireless_associate_network(hw, network);
> >
> > it's getting late here, so i might be missing some really obvious
> > solution (and Jiri is asleep i suspect), so below is a temporary patch
> > that marks the driver CONFIG_BROKEN until this is resolved. This gets
> > allyesconfig going on x86.
>
> I suspect that this:
>
> --- a/drivers/char/pcmcia/ipwireless/hardware.c~a
> +++ a/drivers/char/pcmcia/ipwireless/hardware.c
> @@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ static struct ipw_rx_packet *pool_alloca
> list_del(&packet->queue);
> } else {
> const int min_capacity =
> - ipwireless_ppp_mru(hw->network + 2);
> + ipwireless_ppp_mru(hw->network) + 2;
> int new_capacity;
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hw->lock, flags);
> _
>
> was intended.
ah, indeed. I see, this came from the 12/12 patch:
- static int min_capacity = 256;
+ const int min_capacity =
+ ipwireless_ppp_mru(hw->network + 2);
which was probably a last-minute change. So instead of turning the
driver into something (while the author is sleeping) that was never
tested before, i'd rather suggest to revert commit
a01386924874c4d6d67f8a34e66f04452c2abb69, which seems a non-essential
optimization to the driver and which apparently was not build tested, so
quite likely not functionality tested either. It reverts cleanly here.
OTOH ... your change looks correct enough too.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-28 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-27 19:06 [git pull] cpus4096 fixes Ingo Molnar
2008-07-27 20:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-27 21:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-28 18:42 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-27 21:05 ` Al Viro
2008-07-27 22:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-28 0:42 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-28 3:06 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-28 6:34 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-28 6:58 ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-28 7:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-28 18:12 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-28 8:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-28 18:07 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-28 17:50 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-28 18:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-28 18:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-28 18:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-28 19:22 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-28 19:31 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-28 19:04 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-28 20:57 ` [rfc git pull] cpus4096 fixes, take 2 Ingo Molnar
2008-07-28 21:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-28 21:41 ` [build error] drivers/char/pcmcia/ipwireless/hardware.c:571: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct ipw_network' Ingo Molnar
2008-07-28 22:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-28 22:20 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-28 22:29 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-07-30 14:59 ` David Sterba
2008-07-30 15:11 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-30 15:14 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-07-28 21:36 ` [rfc git pull] cpus4096 fixes, take 2 Mike Travis
2008-07-29 1:45 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-29 12:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-30 0:15 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-28 18:46 ` [git pull] cpus4096 fixes Mike Travis
2008-07-28 19:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-29 1:33 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-28 0:53 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-28 8:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-28 13:21 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-28 18:23 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-31 10:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-28 8:43 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080728222925.GA21012@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.