From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KNeLU-0002hU-5a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:49:48 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KNeLR-0002hI-RF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:49:46 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38050 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KNeLR-0002hF-Lb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:49:45 -0400 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:34394) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KNeLR-0006CX-71 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:49:45 -0400 Received: from jamie by mail2.shareable.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KNeLM-00078W-Ak for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:49:40 +0100 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:49:40 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qcow3 - arbitrary metadata Message-ID: <20080729014939.GA27149@shareable.org> References: <488E2752.7030008@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <488E2752.7030008@codemonkey.ws> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Anthony Liguori wrote: > Can you provide more information about what the metadata is used for and > why it's so important for the metadata to be in the image verses in a > separate file? Yeah, I have the opposite problem - too much in the same file :-) I want to be able to savevm, but some of my VMs don't have any qcow2 images (because I don't trust them for mission-critical VMs since recent discussion, or because they are floppy-only or CD-only VMs with no hard disk). To enable savevm, at least according to docs, I have to have a qcow2 image somewhere. So I add a redundant minimum-size unpartitioned qcow2 hard disk and hope nobody minds... That seems a bit hackish. It would be nice if savevm could just write to a named file and loadvm could read it. -- Jamie