From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 29
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:25:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807291825.14281.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080729172337.b3d74100.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Hi,
On Tuesday 29 July 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since next-20080728:
I keep reverting commit 0e3638d1e04040121af00195f7e4628078246489 ("warn
when statically-allocated kobjects are used") with each linux-next release
to make it work on my x86_32 laptop (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/19/114).
Depending on the day I either forget to revert it on a first try or (lead by
incurable optimism) I don't try to revert it in hope that it was fixed.
Unfortunately the result is always the same cursing-during-qemu-test-run
-> git-revert -> recompile cycle and a needless time loss.
Could we have some action taken please?
Thanks,
Bart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-29 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-29 7:23 linux-next: Tree for July 29 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-29 7:48 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-07-29 14:45 ` Dominik Brodowski
2008-08-03 14:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-04 7:58 ` Dominik Brodowski
2008-07-29 16:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2008-07-29 18:16 ` Greg KH
2008-07-29 20:49 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-07-30 4:48 ` Greg KH
2008-07-30 7:06 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-07-30 9:19 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-30 19:27 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-07-30 20:04 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-30 23:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-30 23:44 ` Greg KH
2008-08-07 1:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-07 3:40 ` Greg KH
2008-08-07 6:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-30 1:05 ` linux-next: usb tree fix (Was: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 29) Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-30 19:38 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-29 7:36 linux-next: Tree for July 29 Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-29 4:32 Stephen Rothwell
2011-07-29 7:38 Stephen Rothwell
2011-07-30 11:38 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-07-30 16:08 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-30 16:16 ` Sedat Dilek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200807291825.14281.bzolnier@gmail.com \
--to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.