All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	simon.wunderlich@s2003.tu-chemnitz.de, siwu@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: send correct MTU value in PMTU (revised)
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:50:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080730135008.4f98f5ee.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080730133259.576e0041@extreme>

On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:32:59 -0700
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> When bridging interfaces with different MTUs, the bridge correctly chooses
> the minimum of the MTUs of the physical devices as the bridges MTU.  But
> when a frame is passed which fits through the incoming, but not through
> the outgoing interface, a "Fragmentation Needed" packet is generated.
> 
> However, the propagated MTU is hardcoded to 1500, which is wrong in this
> situation.  The sender will repeat the packet again with the same frame
> size, and the same problem will occur again.
> 
> Instead of sending 1500, the (correct) MTU value of the bridge is now sent
> via PMTU.  To achieve this, the corresponding rtable structure is stored
> in its net_bridge structure.
> 
> Modified to get rid of fake_net_device as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Wunderlich <siwu@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>

um.

a) Why was this To:me and not To:davem?  I'm trying to get rid of it ;)

b) The way you sent this email indicates that you wrote the patch. 
   To preserve correct attribution, please put a From: line right at the
   top of the changelog.

c) For the record, here are the changes which you (I assume) made to
   Simon's patch:

   (br_netfilter_rtable_init() no longer initialises
   fake_rtable.rt_flags.  Deliberate?)


 net/bridge/br_if.c        |   26 +-------------------------
 net/bridge/br_netfilter.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
 net/bridge/br_private.h   |    5 +++--
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff -puN net/bridge/br_if.c~bridge-send-correct-mtu-value-in-pmtu-revised net/bridge/br_if.c
--- a/net/bridge/br_if.c~bridge-send-correct-mtu-value-in-pmtu-revised
+++ a/net/bridge/br_if.c
@@ -168,23 +168,6 @@ static void del_br(struct net_bridge *br
 	unregister_netdevice(br->dev);
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER
-/* We need these fake structures to make netfilter happy --
- * lots of places assume that skb->dst != NULL, which isn't
- * all that unreasonable.
- *
- * Currently, we fill in the PMTU entry because netfilter
- * refragmentation needs it, and the rt_flags entry because
- * ipt_REJECT needs it.  Future netfilter modules might
- * require us to fill additional fields. */
-struct net_device __fake_net_device = {
-	.hard_header_len	= ETH_HLEN,
-#ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
-	.nd_net			= &init_net,
-#endif
-};
-#endif
-
 static struct net_device *new_bridge_dev(const char *name)
 {
 	struct net_bridge *br;
@@ -220,14 +203,7 @@ static struct net_device *new_bridge_dev
 	br->topology_change_detected = 0;
 	br->ageing_time = 300 * HZ;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER
-	atomic_set(&br->fake_rtable.u.dst.__refcnt, 1);
-	br->fake_rtable.u.dst.dev = &__fake_net_device;
-	br->fake_rtable.u.dst.path = &br->fake_rtable.u.dst;
-	br->fake_rtable.u.dst.metrics[RTAX_MTU - 1] = 1500;
-	br->fake_rtable.u.dst.flags	= DST_NOXFRM;
-	br->fake_rtable.rt_flags = 0;
-#endif
+	br_netfilter_rtable_init(br);
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&br->age_list);
 
diff -puN net/bridge/br_netfilter.c~bridge-send-correct-mtu-value-in-pmtu-revised net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c~bridge-send-correct-mtu-value-in-pmtu-revised
+++ a/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
@@ -101,6 +101,24 @@ static inline __be16 pppoe_proto(const s
 	 pppoe_proto(skb) == htons(PPP_IPV6) && \
 	 brnf_filter_pppoe_tagged)
 
+/*
+ * Initialize bogus route table used to keep netfilter happy.
+ * Currently, we fill in the PMTU entry because netfilter
+ * refragmentation needs it, and the rt_flags entry because
+ * ipt_REJECT needs it.  Future netfilter modules might
+ * require us to fill additional fields.
+ */
+void br_netfilter_rtable_init(struct net_bridge *br)
+{
+	struct rtable *rt = &br->fake_rtable;
+
+	atomic_set(&rt->u.dst.__refcnt, 1);
+	rt->u.dst.dev = &br->dev;
+	rt->u.dst.path = &rt->u.dst;
+	rt->u.dst.metrics[RTAX_MTU - 1] = 1500;
+	rt->u.dst.flags	= DST_NOXFRM;
+}
+
 static inline struct rtable *bridge_parent_rtable(const struct net_device *dev)
 {
 	struct net_bridge_port *port = rcu_dereference(dev->br_port);
diff -puN net/bridge/br_private.h~bridge-send-correct-mtu-value-in-pmtu-revised net/bridge/br_private.h
--- a/net/bridge/br_private.h~bridge-send-correct-mtu-value-in-pmtu-revised
+++ a/net/bridge/br_private.h
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/netdevice.h>
 #include <linux/if_bridge.h>
-#include <net/route.h>	/* struct rtable, RTAX_MTU */
+#include <net/route.h>
 
 #define BR_HASH_BITS 8
 #define BR_HASH_SIZE (1 << BR_HASH_BITS)
@@ -201,10 +201,11 @@ extern int br_ioctl_deviceless_stub(stru
 #ifdef CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER
 extern int br_netfilter_init(void);
 extern void br_netfilter_fini(void);
+extern void br_netfilter_rtable_init(struct net_bridge *);
 #else
 #define br_netfilter_init()	(0)
 #define br_netfilter_fini()	do { } while(0)
-extern struct net_device __fake_net_device;
+#define br_netfilter_rtable_init(x)
 #endif
 
 /* br_stp.c */
_


  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-30 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-30 19:37 [patch 02/11] bridge: send correct MTU value in PMTU akpm
2008-07-30 20:32 ` [PATCH] bridge: send correct MTU value in PMTU (revised) Stephen Hemminger
2008-07-30 20:50   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-07-30 21:10     ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-07-30 23:28       ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080730135008.4f98f5ee.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=simon.wunderlich@s2003.tu-chemnitz.de \
    --cc=siwu@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.