From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [patch nacked? 3/4] Update smc91x driver with ARM Versatile board info Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:51:14 -0700 Message-ID: <20080730165114.3c3b0fb5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <200807301940.m6UJemPm012683@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <20080730224255.GB12409@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20080730160858.74053884.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080730234136.GC12409@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dsaxena@plexity.net, nico@cam.org To: Russell King Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:41556 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752255AbYG3XwX (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:52:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080730234136.GC12409@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:41:36 +0100 Russell King wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 04:08:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:42:55 +0100 > > Russell King wrote: > > > > > Are you aware that smc91x.h _already_ contains a CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE > > > section? > > > > > > > Are you aware that I don't maintain arm, net drivers or smc91x.h? > > > > Are you aware that smartarse rhetorical questions are exceedingly > > irritating? > > Sigh. That's a fucking annoying response to my perfectly legitimate > question. > That is a fake response. You have no possible interest in what I or Deepak are or are not aware of. You just chose it as an opportunity to be snooty, arrgoant and condescending. I still don't know if the patch (or some variation of it) is still needed - that's how useless your response was. It's in your hands now. If it is still needed then please apply it, perhaps after suitable modification.