From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Craig L. Ching" <cching@mqsoftware.com>,
sverre@rabbelier.nl, Git Mailinglist <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Monotone workflow compared to Git workflow ( was RE: Git vs Monotone)
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:50:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080801025024.GA18529@anvil.corenet.prv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807311426090.3277@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 02:40:55PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Sure, if you want to keep the build tree around, you would probably not
> > use branches.
>
> Side note: it's often faster to recompile, if your project has a good
> build system.
>
> For example, for the kernel, I can literally rebuild my whole kernel
> (which is just what I use on _that_ machine) in about 16 seconds. This is
> _not_ using ccache or anything else - it's rebuilding the whole tree with
> -j16.
>
Is it after make mrproper (wow)? Or is it when your branches are
"recent"? Because for me (and well, I dont have that beefy boxes as you
do) swithing between "for-linus" and "next" that based off a revision in
vicinity of 2.6.xx-rc1 and "work" which tracks the tip of your tree
takes time to rebuild.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-01 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-31 18:13 Git vs Monotone Sverre Rabbelier
2008-07-31 18:33 ` Stephen R. van den Berg
2008-07-31 18:52 ` Petr Baudis
2008-07-31 19:02 ` Jeff King
2008-07-31 19:11 ` Craig L. Ching
2008-07-31 19:19 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2008-07-31 20:32 ` Jeff King
2008-07-31 19:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-31 19:28 ` Craig L. Ching
2008-07-31 19:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-31 20:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-31 20:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-23 19:23 ` Felipe Contreras
2008-07-31 20:42 ` Blum, Robert
2008-08-10 22:15 ` Robin Rosenberg
2008-08-01 9:57 ` David Kastrup
2008-07-31 19:48 ` Monotone workflow compared to Git workflow ( was RE: Git vs Monotone) Craig L. Ching
2008-07-31 20:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-31 20:18 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-07-31 20:37 ` Craig L. Ching
2008-07-31 20:54 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-07-31 21:10 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-07-31 21:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-31 21:43 ` Martin Langhoff
2008-07-31 21:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-01 2:50 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2008-08-01 3:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-01 3:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-31 20:57 ` Sean Estabrooks
2008-07-31 21:22 ` Theodore Tso
2008-07-31 19:24 ` Git vs Monotone Theodore Tso
2008-08-01 7:23 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2008-08-01 18:00 ` Daniel Barkalow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080801025024.GA18529@anvil.corenet.prv \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=cching@mqsoftware.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sverre@rabbelier.nl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.