From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQ3FX-0001Dc-Of for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:49:35 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQ3FV-00019M-Kz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:49:34 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41808 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQ3FV-00018y-Fw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:49:33 -0400 Received: from relay01.mx.bawue.net ([193.7.176.67]:50329) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KQ3FV-0006oW-7a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:49:33 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 18:49:28 +0200 From: Thiemo Seufer Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] Fix compilation of nbd on Windows Message-ID: <20080804164927.GA4102@networkno.de> References: <20080704115101.5BC9.20F538E7@nsfocus.com> <1215160927.3802.4.camel@frecb07144> <20080704203231.GB31670@networkno.de> <4895E6CC.6040906@codemonkey.ws> <4896182A.1040001@codemonkey.ws> <20080804132915.GB18868@shareable.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080804132915.GB18868@shareable.org> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jamie Lokier Cc: Laurent Vivier , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, chenqing Jamie Lokier wrote: > Anthony Liguori wrote: > > Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > >Hi, > > > > > >[was it intentional that you culled me, and me alone, from the Cc: list? > > > I know that you like to be rude against me, but I'd like to know if it > > > was really meant this way this time.] > > > > > > > No, it's the annoying way that the mailing list is configured. The > > mailing list sets a Reply-To header and reply to all in thunderbird > > ignores the original From line (because Reply-To has been set). > > Mutt's group-reply function is the same. It sends to everyone in the > To and Cc, but not the person in From! Very annoying on a list like this. > It has an option to ignore list's Reply-To entirely, but not an option > to make group-reply send to everyone. Maybe unset reply_to helps in this case. Thiemo