From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQJaP-0007bl-7F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 06:16:13 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQJaL-0007bH-NJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 06:16:11 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54392 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQJaK-0007ax-3i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 06:16:09 -0400 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:10572) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KQJaJ-00050G-PA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 06:16:08 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 11:15:30 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu Message-ID: <20080805101529.GG4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com> References: <1217865045-10722-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <48973F8E.8080109@codemonkey.ws> <4898245F.3010902@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4898245F.3010902@redhat.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Jackson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Gerd Hoffmann, le Tue 05 Aug 2008 11:58:55 +0200, a écrit : > Anthony Liguori wrote: > > However, I'd like to see agreement within the Xen community that this > > is the right approach first. In particular, I would like to see > > these patches either merged with upstream Xen or for upstream Xen to > > plan to rebase against QEMU to pick them up and use them for PV > > support. > > Ian Jackson has a qemu git tree at > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ijackson/qemu-xen.git > > As far I know it is rebased now and then and the long-term plan is to > get the delta to upstream qemu at least smaller. Dunno whenever it ever > will be zero due to stuff like mapcache. There are two branches there: the xen branch is stuff that Ian indeed doesn't intend to push. The qemu branch is stuff that he wishes to push. Samuel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 11:15:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20080805101529.GG4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com> References: <1217865045-10722-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <48973F8E.8080109@codemonkey.ws> <4898245F.3010902@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4898245F.3010902@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Jackson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Gerd Hoffmann, le Tue 05 Aug 2008 11:58:55 +0200, a =E9crit : > Anthony Liguori wrote: > > However, I'd like to see agreement within the Xen community that this > > is the right approach first. In particular, I would like to see=20 > > these patches either merged with upstream Xen or for upstream Xen to=20 > > plan to rebase against QEMU to pick them up and use them for PV=20 > > support. >=20 > Ian Jackson has a qemu git tree at > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ijackson/qemu-xen.git >=20 > As far I know it is rebased now and then and the long-term plan is to > get the delta to upstream qemu at least smaller. Dunno whenever it eve= r > will be zero due to stuff like mapcache. There are two branches there: the xen branch is stuff that Ian indeed doesn't intend to push. The qemu branch is stuff that he wishes to push. Samuel