From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQKjY-00086c-5X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:29:44 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQKjW-00084f-PZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:29:43 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54437 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQKjW-00084I-Ca for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:29:42 -0400 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:18787) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KQKjW-0002Tp-0G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:29:42 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:29:35 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu Message-ID: <20080805112935.GO4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com> References: <1217865045-10722-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <48973F8E.8080109@codemonkey.ws> <20080805104630.GM4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <489835A3.6030804@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <489835A3.6030804@redhat.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Jackson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Gerd Hoffmann, le Tue 05 Aug 2008 13:12:35 +0200, a écrit : > > I have not had a precise look at e.g. the xenfb.c code, but if what Gerd > > has submitted is exactly the same as xen-unstable's, then that part is > > already merged :) > > It isn't exactly the same code. For example the xenbus state engine has > been factored out into generic code, shared by all backend drivers. Then it'd probably be good to push that upstream Xen. Samuel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:29:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20080805112935.GO4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com> References: <1217865045-10722-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <48973F8E.8080109@codemonkey.ws> <20080805104630.GM4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <489835A3.6030804@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <489835A3.6030804@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Jackson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Gerd Hoffmann, le Tue 05 Aug 2008 13:12:35 +0200, a =E9crit : > > I have not had a precise look at e.g. the xenfb.c code, but if what G= erd > > has submitted is exactly the same as xen-unstable's, then that part i= s > > already merged :) >=20 > It isn't exactly the same code. For example the xenbus state engine ha= s > been factored out into generic code, shared by all backend drivers. Then it'd probably be good to push that upstream Xen. Samuel