From: Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@visp.net.lb>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: thousands of classes, e1000 TX unit hang
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:13:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808051413.58795.denys@visp.net.lb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080805110453.GA6541@ff.dom.local>
On Tuesday 05 August 2008, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On 05-08-2008 12:05, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> > I found, that packetloss happening when i am deleting/adding classes.
> > I attach result of oprofile as file.
>
> ...
>
> Deleting of estimators (gen_kill_estimator) isn't optimized for
> a large number of them, and it's a known issue. Adding of classes
> shouldn't be such a problem, but maybe you could try to do this
> before adding filters directing to those classes.
>
> Since you can control rate with htb, I'm not sure you really need
> policing: at least you could try if removing this changes anything.
> And I'm not sure: do these tx hangs happen only when classes are
> added/deleted or otherwise too?
>
> Jarek P.
Policer is creating burst for me.
For example first 2Mbyte(+rate*time if need more precision) will pass on high
speed (1Mbit), then if flow is still using maximum bandwidth will be
throttled to rate of HTB. When i tried to play with cburst/burst values in
HTB i was not able to archieve same results. I can do same with TBF and his
peakrate/burst, but not with HTB.
It happens when root qdisc deleted(which holds around 130 child classes).
Probably gen_kill_estimator taking all resources while i am deleting root
class.
I did some test, on machine with 150 ppp interfaces (Pentium 4 3.2 Ghz),
just by deleting root qdisc and i got huge packetloss. When i am just adding
classes - there is no significant packetloss.
Probably it is not right thing, when i am deleting qdisc on ppp - causing
packetloss on whole system? Is it possible to workaround, till
gen_kill_estimator will be rewritten?
But sure i can try to avoid "mass deleting" classes, but i think many people
will hit this bug, especially newbies, who implement "many class" setup.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-05 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-05 7:47 thousands of classes, e1000 TX unit hang Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-08-05 8:06 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-08-05 10:05 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-08-05 11:04 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-05 11:13 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko [this message]
2008-08-05 12:23 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-05 13:02 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-08-05 16:41 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-05 16:48 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-08-05 21:14 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-05 14:07 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-08-05 16:48 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-05 17:18 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-08-06 1:13 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200808051413.58795.denys@visp.net.lb \
--to=denys@visp.net.lb \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.