From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@citrix.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: Spinlock recursion in hvc_poll
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 22:53:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808052253.10285.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48989727.8090804@goop.org>
Am Dienstag, 5. August 2008 schrieb Jeremy Fitzhardinge:
> Alex Nixon wrote:
> >>> Well I say fixed - it just means I can proceed to a spinlock recursion
> >>> BUG() 2 secs into the boot process, but it should be easier to track
down
> >>> with printks and a coherent stack dump at my disposal.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> What's the backtrace on this?
> >>
> >
> > I just turned DEBUG_SPINLOCKS back on to try catch this bug again, and it
> > seems to occur (very roughly) 1/10 of the time, with nothing changing
between
> > runs.
Ok, this is a guess, I dont fully understand the backtrace.
request_irq tries to call the handler if the IRQ is shared. The irq handler
calls hvc_poll and hvc_kill which might take the same spinlock.
Can you test it this patch fixes the problem?
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
drivers/char/hvc_console.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/char/hvc_console.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/char/hvc_console.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/char/hvc_console.c
@@ -322,10 +322,11 @@ static int hvc_open(struct tty_struct *t
hp->tty = tty;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hp->lock, flags);
+
if (hp->ops->notifier_add)
rc = hp->ops->notifier_add(hp, hp->data);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hp->lock, flags);
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-05 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <48973E59.1000904@citrix.com>
[not found] ` <489742CF.2030305@goop.org>
[not found] ` <4898096F.4030607@citrix.com>
[not found] ` <48987526.40500@goop.org>
[not found] ` <48987DD8.8080009@citrix.com>
2008-08-05 18:08 ` Spinlock recursion in hvc_poll Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-05 20:53 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2008-08-06 9:12 ` Alex Nixon
2008-08-07 7:18 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-08-08 6:50 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200808052253.10285.borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.nixon@citrix.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.