From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: sfq dump broken in 2.6.27-rc1 Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:22:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080806.202210.92821768.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20080806180237.4912a677@extreme> <20080806.181327.139395860.davem@davemloft.net> <20080806202029.63f25c81@extreme> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kaber@trash.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: stephen.hemminger@vyatta.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:50673 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752338AbYHGDWJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 23:22:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080806202029.63f25c81@extreme> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Stephen Hemminger Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 20:20:29 -0700 > What ever happened to "you broke it, you fix it?" What ever happened to debugging things by reading the code and thinking? By all means, when I'm dealing with a user who doesn't know the kernel or networking in particular very well, going the bisect route is often the way. But for someone as skilled and knowledgable as you? Give me a break :-)