From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQlEP-0000Pl-Tm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:47:21 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQlEM-0000LG-9g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:47:21 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38684 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQlEM-0000Ky-4z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:47:18 -0400 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:4060) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KQlEL-0002ZL-IP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:47:18 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:47:13 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu Message-ID: <20080806154713.GQ4448@implementation.uk.xensource.com> References: <20080805154140.GV4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <48997981.1030703@redhat.com> <20080806102338.GA4448@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <20080806125055.GG4448@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <4899AD19.8060606@redhat.com> <20080806140132.GL4448@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <4899B06F.2090101@redhat.com> <20080806142526.GN4448@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <4899C4CB.2020105@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4899C4CB.2020105@redhat.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Jackson , Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Gerd Hoffmann, le Wed 06 Aug 2008 17:35:39 +0200, a écrit : > > AGAIN, THERE IS THE IAN JACKSON TREE. > > > > Thanks for reading. > > I get build failures when patching THE IAN JACKSON TREE due to THE IAN > JACKSON TREE lagging behind upstream. You didn't mention that. "lagging" a few months indeed, while merging stuff. And because xen 4.0 is about to be released, but it will probably catch up soon. Anyway that's not a reason for not using it, I guess the build failures can be fixed more easily than redoing Ian's work. > > Ian has _already_ done that hard work. > > Oh, rebasing isn't a one-shot thing. You have to do it over and over > again. Sure, that's why Ian was quite harsh on the modifications to the qemu code, and these are quite small now (I'm talking about the Xen-specific things, non-Xen-specific will be pushed upstream), so that shouldn't be a problem any more. SAmuel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:47:13 +0100 Message-ID: <20080806154713.GQ4448@implementation.uk.xensource.com> References: <20080805154140.GV4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <48997981.1030703@redhat.com> <20080806102338.GA4448@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <20080806125055.GG4448@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <4899AD19.8060606@redhat.com> <20080806140132.GL4448@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <4899B06F.2090101@redhat.com> <20080806142526.GN4448@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <4899C4CB.2020105@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4899C4CB.2020105@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Jackson , Markus Armbruster , Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Gerd Hoffmann, le Wed 06 Aug 2008 17:35:39 +0200, a =E9crit : > > AGAIN, THERE IS THE IAN JACKSON TREE. > > > > Thanks for reading. >=20 > I get build failures when patching THE IAN JACKSON TREE due to THE IAN > JACKSON TREE lagging behind upstream. You didn't mention that. "lagging" a few months indeed, while merging stuff. And because xen 4.0 is about to be released, but it will probably catch up soon. Anyway that's not a reason for not using it, I guess the build failures can be fixed more easily than redoing Ian's work. > > Ian has _already_ done that hard work. >=20 > Oh, rebasing isn't a one-shot thing. You have to do it over and over > again. Sure, that's why Ian was quite harsh on the modifications to the qemu code, and these are quite small now (I'm talking about the Xen-specific things, non-Xen-specific will be pushed upstream), so that shouldn't be a problem any more. SAmuel