From: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org,
ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-pxa: fix scheduling while atomic in i2c_pxa_abort()
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 23:38:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080806223816.GD2716@fluff.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080805111711.GA4807-nIupHZaCssqR2kOLt6zJ8ErlnG4Plg33XqFh9Ls21Oc@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 03:17:11PM +0400, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> i2c_pxa_abort can be called from the atomic context.
> Change it to use mdelay and counted loop.
if this can be called from an atomic context, is there a distinct
possibility you are going to stop execution of the entire cpu for
the time it takes to sort this out? Is it possible to disable the
interrupt request, fire a work-struct to deal with this and then
re-enabled the controller once it is finished?
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c
> index dde6ce9..9a0f788 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c
> @@ -188,14 +188,14 @@ static inline int i2c_pxa_is_slavemode(struct pxa_i2c *i2c)
>
> static void i2c_pxa_abort(struct pxa_i2c *i2c)
> {
> - unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ/4;
> + int i = 250;
>
> if (i2c_pxa_is_slavemode(i2c)) {
> dev_dbg(&i2c->adap.dev, "%s: called in slave mode\n", __func__);
> return;
> }
>
> - while (time_before(jiffies, timeout) && (readl(_IBMR(i2c)) & 0x1) == 0) {
> + while ((i > 0) && (readl(_IBMR(i2c)) & 0x1) == 0) {
> unsigned long icr = readl(_ICR(i2c));
>
> icr &= ~ICR_START;
> @@ -205,7 +205,8 @@ static void i2c_pxa_abort(struct pxa_i2c *i2c)
>
> show_state(i2c);
>
> - msleep(1);
> + mdelay(1);
> + i --;
> }
>
> writel(readl(_ICR(i2c)) & ~(ICR_MA | ICR_START | ICR_STOP),
> --
> 1.5.6.3
>
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> i2c mailing list
> i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
--
Ben (ben-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-06 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-05 11:17 [PATCH] i2c-pxa: fix scheduling while atomic in i2c_pxa_abort() Dmitry Baryshkov
[not found] ` <20080805111711.GA4807-nIupHZaCssqR2kOLt6zJ8ErlnG4Plg33XqFh9Ls21Oc@public.gmane.org>
2008-08-06 22:38 ` Ben Dooks [this message]
2008-08-07 10:12 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080806223816.GD2716@fluff.org.uk \
--to=ben-linux-elnmno+kys3ytjvyw6ydsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dbaryshkov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.