From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: Problems building caml-stubdom Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:58:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20080807105828.GD6604@implementation.uk.xensource.com> References: <20080807005534.GL4486@implementation> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Geoffrey Lefebvre Cc: Andrew Warfield , Patrick Colp , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Geoffrey Lefebvre, le Wed 06 Aug 2008 23:56:21 -0700, a =E9crit : > > Ok. I had just tested with the debian-provided caml binaries. >=20 > I was originally using the ubuntu 8.04 ocaml binaries and I also tried > using the ocaml 3.09 tar ball from inria. The source code itself probably doesn't matter so much, it's actually rather the configuration and glibc it's linking with that matters. > Following your advice, I tried building the caml stubdomain using > debian 4.0. The version of ocaml is 3.09.2. I get undefined reference > to open64 and lseek64. I guess you have a 32bit machine? I don't think I have tried that. The problem here is that the caml binary uses the linux ABI. I don't think we want to support that ad aeternam. I hoped that for (very) basic use we wouldn't have to recompile caml. I guess I can easily just add them, I'll see. > Which version of debian and ocaml did you use to build the stub > domain? debian 3.10.2-3. Samuel