From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
davem@davemloft.net, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: possible recursive locking in udp4_lib_rcv
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 02:46:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080807234613.GA9598@google.com> (raw)
Hi!
I noticed the following warnings when running on 2.6.27-rc2
with lockdep checker enabled:
[ 2912.004106] Initializing XFRM netlink socket
[ 2922.009629]
[ 2922.009632] =============================================
[ 2922.009640] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[ 2922.009643] 2.6.27-rc2-mst-suspend #32
[ 2922.009645] ---------------------------------------------
[ 2922.009648] Xorg/5958 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 2922.009650] (slock-AF_INET/1){-+..}, at: [<c02f105a>] __udp4_lib_rcv+0x34a/0x920
[ 2922.009660]
[ 2922.009661] but task is already holding lock:
[ 2922.009663] (slock-AF_INET/1){-+..}, at: [<c02f105a>] __udp4_lib_rcv+0x34a/0x920
[ 2922.009669]
[ 2922.009669] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 2922.009672] 4 locks held by Xorg/5958:
[ 2922.009674] #0: (rcu_read_lock){..--}, at: [<c02af476>] netif_receive_skb+0x66/0x390
[ 2922.009681] #1: (rcu_read_lock){..--}, at: [<c02d1cc0>] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x30/0x1f0
[ 2922.009688] #2: (slock-AF_INET/1){-+..}, at: [<c02f105a>] __udp4_lib_rcv+0x34a/0x920
[ 2922.009694] #3: (rcu_read_lock){..--}, at: [<c02d1cc0>] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x30/0x1f0
[ 2922.009700]
2922.009701] stack backtrace:
[ 2922.009704] Pid: 5958, comm: Xorg Not tainted 2.6.27-rc2-mst-suspend #32
[ 2922.009707] [<c014acc6>] __lock_acquire+0xee6/0x1130
[ 2922.009713] [<c014af71>] lock_acquire+0x61/0x80
[ 2922.009717] [<c02f105a>] ? __udp4_lib_rcv+0x34a/0x920
[ 2922.009721] [<c033008a>] _spin_lock_nested+0x2a/0x40
[ 2922.009726] [<c02f105a>] ? __udp4_lib_rcv+0x34a/0x920
[ 2922.009731] [<c02f105a>] __udp4_lib_rcv+0x34a/0x920
[ 2922.009738] [<f8c81360>] ? ipv4_confirm+0x0/0xe0 [nf_conntrack_ipv4]
[ 2922.009746] [<c02cb549>] ? nf_iterate+0x59/0x80
[ 2922.009751] [<c02f1642>] udp_rcv+0x12/0x20
[ 2922.009755] [<c02d1d3a>] ip_local_deliver_finish+0xaa/0x1f0
[ 2922.009758] [<c02d1cc0>] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0x30/0x1f0
[ 2922.009763] [<c02d2250>] ip_local_deliver+0x30/0xa0
[ 2922.009766] [<c02d1c90>] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0x0/0x1f0
[ 2922.009770] [<c030943b>] xfrm4_transport_finish+0x6b/0xf0
[ 2922.009776] [<c0309170>] ? xfrm4_rcv_encap_finish+0x0/0x60
[ 2922.009780] [<c031099d>] xfrm_input+0x22d/0x360
[ 2922.009784] [<c03091f3>] xfrm4_rcv_encap+0x23/0x30
[ 2922.009788] [<c030939b>] xfrm4_udp_encap_rcv+0x16b/0x1a0
[ 2922.009792] [<c02f0bc4>] udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x174/0x2c0
[ 2922.009795] [<c0330091>] ? _spin_lock_nested+0x31/0x40
[ 2922.009800] [<c02f148e>] __udp4_lib_rcv+0x77e/0x920
[ 2922.009805] [<f8c81360>] ? ipv4_confirm+0x0/0xe0 [nf_conntrack_ipv4]
[ 2922.009811] [<c02cb549>] ? nf_iterate+0x59/0x80
[ 2922.009816] [<c02f1642>] udp_rcv+0x12/0x20
[ 2922.009819] [<c02d1d3a>] ip_local_deliver_finish+0xaa/0x1f0
[ 2922.009822] [<c02d1cc0>] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0x30/0x1f0
[ 2922.009827] [<c02d2250>] ip_local_deliver+0x30/0xa0
[ 2922.009830] [<c02d1c90>] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0x0/0x1f0
[ 2922.009834] [<c02d1a3e>] ip_rcv_finish+0xfe/0x350
[ 2922.009838] [<c02cb719>] ? nf_hook_slow+0xd9/0x100
[ 2922.009842] [<c02d1940>] ? ip_rcv_finish+0x0/0x350
[ 2922.009846] [<c02d2136>] ip_rcv+0x1a6/0x290
[ 2922.009849] [<c02d1940>] ? ip_rcv_finish+0x0/0x350
[ 2922.009853] [<c02d1f90>] ? ip_rcv+0x0/0x290
[ 2922.009857] [<c02af638>] netif_receive_skb+0x228/0x390
[ 2922.009860] [<c02af476>] ? netif_receive_skb+0x66/0x390
[ 2922.009865] [<f8cb9550>] ? packet_rcv_spkt+0x0/0x110 [af_packet]
[ 2922.009872] [<c02b1fcc>] process_backlog+0x7c/0xe0
[ 2922.009876] [<c02b1887>] net_rx_action+0xa7/0x150
[ 2922.009879] [<c012ca47>] __do_softirq+0x87/0x100
[ 2922.009883] [<c012cb17>] do_softirq+0x57/0x60
[ 2922.009887] [<c012cea7>] irq_exit+0x77/0x90
[ 2922.009890] [<c01060c5>] do_IRQ+0x45/0x80
[ 2922.009894] [<c01498f4>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xc4/0x150
[ 2922.009899] [<c010463c>] common_interrupt+0x28/0x30
[ 2922.009903] =======================
[ 2922.277171] PPP generic driver version 2.4.2
(I'm not sure what I did, something related to ipsec and/or ppp).
I have not seen this with v2.6.26 or earlier.
Any idea whether this is a real bug or lockdep false positive?
--
MST
next reply other threads:[~2008-08-07 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-07 23:46 Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2008-08-08 14:28 ` possible recursive locking in udp4_lib_rcv Herbert Xu
2008-08-08 14:37 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-08 15:01 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-08 15:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2008-08-09 3:50 ` Hideo AOKI
2008-08-09 7:36 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080807234613.GA9598@google.com \
--to=m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.