From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: slavic@chicu.ro
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: acpi notify
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 17:07:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808081707.58412.trenn@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <489C5D67.6060704@chicu.ro>
Hi,
acpi notify?
On Friday 08 August 2008 16:51:19 Chicu Veaceslav wrote:
> [ 0.000000] Entering add_active_range(0, 0, 259728) 0 entries of 256
> used [ 0.000000] Zone PFN ranges:
> [ 0.000000] DMA 0 -> 4096
> [ 0.000000] Normal 4096 -> 229376
> [ 0.000000] HighMem 229376 -> 259728
> [ 0.000000] Movable zone start PFN for each node
> [ 0.000000] early_node_map[1] active PFN ranges
> [ 0.000000] 0: 0 -> 259728
> [ 0.000000] On node 0 totalpages: 259728
> [ 0.000000] DMA zone: 32 pages used for memmap
> [ 0.000000] DMA zone: 0 pages reserved
> [ 0.000000] DMA zone: 4064 pages, LIFO batch:0
> [ 0.000000] Normal zone: 1760 pages used for memmap
> [ 0.000000] Normal zone: 223520 pages, LIFO batch:31
> [ 0.000000] HighMem zone: 238 pages used for memmap
> [ 0.000000] HighMem zone: 30114 pages, LIFO batch:7
> [ 0.000000] Movable zone: 0 pages used for memmap
> [ 0.000000] DMI present.
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: RSDP 000F7500, 0014 (r0 PTLTD )
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: RSDT 3F691BD8, 0044 (r1 FUJ___ DW1_____ 20070214
> LTP 0)
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: FACP 3F697CAA, 0074 (r1 FUJ___ DW1_____ 20070214
> LOHR 5A)
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: DSDT 3F692626, 5684 (r1 FUJ___ DW1_____ 20070214
> MSFT 100000E)
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: FACS 3F698FC0, 0040
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: APIC 3F697D1E, 0068 (r1 FUJ___ DW1_____ 20070214
> LOHR 5A)
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: HPET 3F697D86, 0038 (r1 FUJ___ DW1_____ 20070214
> LOHR 5A)
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: MCFG 3F697DBE, 003C (r1 FUJ___ DW1_____ 20070214
> LOHR 5A)
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: APIC 3F697DFA, 0068 (r1 FUJ___ DW1_____ 20070214
> LTP 0)
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: BOOT 3F697E62, 0028 (r1 FUJ___ DW1_____ 20070214
> LTP 1)
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: SLIC 3F697E8A, 0176 (r1 FUJ___ DW1_____ 20070214
> LTP 0)
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: SSDT 3F691C1C, 0500 (r1 PmRef CpuPm 3000
> INTL 20050228)
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: BIOS bug: multiple APIC/MADT found, using 0
> [ 0.000000] ACPI: If "acpi_apic_instance=2" works better, notify
> linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Now I got it.
acpi_apic_instance=2 works better for you?
Could you also explain what is working better, so that others get an idea when
to use this boot param.
Thanks,
Thomas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-08 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-08 14:51 acpi notify Chicu Veaceslav
2008-08-08 15:07 ` Thomas Renninger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200808081707.58412.trenn@suse.de \
--to=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slavic@chicu.ro \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.