From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: nigel@nigel.suspend2.net,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
mingo@elte.hu, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec jump: fix code size checking
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:07:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080813100703.10f50b40.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080813131927.GB3957@redhat.com>
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:19:27 -0400 Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 09:04:35AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > Fix building issue when CONFIG_KEXEC=n. Thanks to Vivek Goyal for his
> > reminding.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
> >
> > ---
> > include/asm-x86/kexec.h | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > --- a/include/asm-x86/kexec.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-x86/kexec.h
> > @@ -43,6 +43,9 @@
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> > # define KEXEC_CONTROL_CODE_MAX_SIZE 2048
> > +# ifndef CONFIG_KEXEC
> > +# define kexec_control_code_size 0
> > +# endif
> > #endif
> >
> > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> I think Andrew already fixed it. Right way is to put code in vmlinux.lds.S
> under #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC, than defining the symbol kexec_control_code_size
> if CONFIG_KEXEC=n
I was wondering about that.
I resurrected that patch.
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
nigel@nigel.suspend2.net, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
mingo@elte.hu, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec jump: fix code size checking
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:07:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080813100703.10f50b40.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080813131927.GB3957@redhat.com>
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:19:27 -0400 Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 09:04:35AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > Fix building issue when CONFIG_KEXEC=n. Thanks to Vivek Goyal for his
> > reminding.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
> >
> > ---
> > include/asm-x86/kexec.h | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > --- a/include/asm-x86/kexec.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-x86/kexec.h
> > @@ -43,6 +43,9 @@
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> > # define KEXEC_CONTROL_CODE_MAX_SIZE 2048
> > +# ifndef CONFIG_KEXEC
> > +# define kexec_control_code_size 0
> > +# endif
> > #endif
> >
> > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> I think Andrew already fixed it. Right way is to put code in vmlinux.lds.S
> under #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC, than defining the symbol kexec_control_code_size
> if CONFIG_KEXEC=n
I was wondering about that.
I resurrected that patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-13 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-13 1:04 [PATCH] kexec jump: fix code size checking Huang Ying
2008-08-13 1:04 ` Huang Ying
2008-08-13 2:47 ` Simon Horman
2008-08-13 2:47 ` Simon Horman
2008-08-13 3:05 ` Huang Ying
2008-08-13 3:05 ` Huang Ying
2008-08-13 3:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-08-13 3:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-08-13 5:18 ` Huang Ying
2008-08-13 5:18 ` Huang Ying
2008-08-13 5:51 ` Simon Horman
2008-08-13 5:51 ` Simon Horman
2008-08-13 3:48 ` Simon Horman
2008-08-13 3:48 ` Simon Horman
2008-08-13 13:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-08-13 13:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-08-13 13:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-08-13 13:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-08-13 17:07 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-08-13 17:07 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080813100703.10f50b40.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nigel@nigel.suspend2.net \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.