From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: "Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao" <fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: "Jens Axboe" <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"吉川 拓哉" <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>,
dpshah@google.com
Subject: Re: request->ioprio
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:16:33 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808141216.33688.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1218611163.8001.108.camel@sebastian.kern.oss.ntt.co.jp>
On Wednesday 13 August 2008 17:06:03 Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote:
> Besides, I guess that accessing the io context information (such as
> ioprio) of a request through elevator-specific private structures is not
> something we want virtio_blk (or future users) to do.
The only semantic I assumed was "higher is better". The server (ie. host) can
really only use the information to schedule between I/Os for that particular
guest anyway.
But it sounds like I should be passing "0" in there unconditionally until the
kernel semantics are sorted out and I can do something more intelligent? I
haven't checked, but I assume that's actually what's happening at the moment
(the field is zero)?
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-14 4:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1218014196.4419.44.camel@sebastian.kern.oss.ntt.co.jp>
2008-08-06 20:33 ` request->ioprio Rusty Russell
2008-08-13 7:06 ` request->ioprio Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-13 8:14 ` [PATCH] virtio_blk: use a wrapper function to access io context information of IO requests Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-14 4:42 ` Rusty Russell
2008-08-14 5:17 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-14 5:22 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-14 7:58 ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-14 2:16 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2008-08-14 4:26 ` request->ioprio Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-15 5:51 ` request->ioprio Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-16 7:13 ` request->ioprio Rusty Russell
2008-08-06 9:32 request->ioprio Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-06 17:22 ` request->ioprio Divyesh Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200808141216.33688.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=dpshah@google.com \
--cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.