From: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] x86: fix section mismatch warning - spp_getpage()
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:32:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080815163212.GA5408@joi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080815135027.GB14103@elte.hu>
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 03:50:27PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I looked at both implementations of arch_setup_additional_pages and
> > didn't see any call to native_set_fixmap or function which calls
> > directly native_set_fixmap... Can you tell me what's the callchain?
>
> the callchain would be:
>
> [ 20.116039] PM: Adding info for No Bus:vcsa1
> [ 20.180039] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at c0833e44
> [ 20.180039] IP: [<c0833e44>] native_set_fixmap+0x0/0x1d
> [ 20.180039] *pde = 36f2a163 *pte = 00833162
> [ 20.180039] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> [ 20.180039] Modules linked in:
> [ 20.180039]
> [ 20.180039] Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted (2.6.27-rc3-00005-g844342a-dirty #24071)
> [ 20.180039] EIP: 0060:[<c0833e44>] EFLAGS: 00010216 CPU: 0
> [ 20.180039] EIP is at native_set_fixmap+0x0/0x1d
> [ 20.180039] EAX: 00000001 EBX: 00000001 ECX: 00000025 EDX: 3782e000
> [ 20.180039] ESI: 00000000 EDI: f671c000 EBP: f7836e68 ESP: f7836e4c
> [ 20.180039] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068
> [ 20.180039] Process init (pid: 1, ti=f7836000 task=f7870000 task.ti=f7836000)
> [ 20.180039] Stack: c011d580 f671c034 c018bbea 00000025 00000000 00000988 f6ef2000 f7836f1c
> [ 20.180039] c01b43d6 00000003 00000008 f7836f7c f782fd10 00000003 f78b6100 08048000
> [ 20.180039] 00000000 00000001 f67a2500 08050b99 08050b99 00000000 00000000 00000000
> [ 20.180039] Call Trace:
> [ 20.180039] [<c011d580>] ? arch_setup_additional_pages+0x8c/0x124
> [ 20.180039] [<c018bbea>] ? try_module_get+0x8/0x2f
> [ 20.180039] [<c01b43d6>] ? load_elf_binary+0xae6/0x1108
> [ 20.180039] [<c0144c6d>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0x43/0x48
> [ 20.180039] [<c018c0c0>] ? search_binary_handler+0x92/0x1e5
> [ 20.180039] [<c01b38f0>] ? load_elf_binary+0x0/0x1108
> [ 20.180039] [<c018d2d7>] ? do_execve+0x14c/0x1d8
> [ 20.180039] [<c0101dd8>] ? sys_execve+0x2e/0x56
> [ 20.180039] [<c01030ca>] ? syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> [ 20.180039] [<c01067c8>] ? kernel_execve+0x1c/0x21
> [ 20.180039] [<c0101286>] ? run_init_process+0x1c/0x1e
> [ 20.180039] [<c0101333>] ? init_post+0xab/0xd4
> [ 20.180039] [<c0103d07>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
> [ 20.180039] =======================
> [ 20.180039] Code: Bad EIP value.
>
> Ingo
Thanks.
arch_setup_additional_pages -> map_compat_vdso -> __set_fixmap -> native_set_fixmap
How about this one?
---
From: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] x86: fix section mismatch warning - spp_getpage()
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x17a3e): Section mismatch in reference from the function set_pte_vaddr_pud() to the function .init.text:spp_getpage()
The function set_pte_vaddr_pud() references
the function __init spp_getpage().
This is often because set_pte_vaddr_pud lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of spp_getpage is wrong.
spp_getpage is called from __init (__init_extra_mapping) and
non __init (set_pte_vaddr_pud) functions, so it can't be __init.
Unfortunately it calls alloc_bootmem_pages which is __init,
but does it only when bootmem allocator is available (after_bootmem == 0).
Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
---
arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 6 +++++-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
index 129618c..f0923ce 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
@@ -88,7 +88,11 @@ early_param("gbpages", parse_direct_gbpages_on);
int after_bootmem;
-static __init void *spp_getpage(void)
+/*
+ * NOTE: This function is marked __ref because it calls __init function
+ * (alloc_bootmem_pages). It's safe to do it ONLY when after_bootmem == 0.
+ */
+static __ref void *spp_getpage(void)
{
void *ptr;
--
1.5.4.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-15 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-12 21:23 [PATCH] x86: fix 2 section mismatch warnings - find_and_reserve_crashkernel Marcin Slusarz
2008-08-13 11:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-13 14:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-15 12:32 ` Marcin Slusarz
2008-08-15 13:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-15 16:32 ` Marcin Slusarz [this message]
2008-08-15 17:14 ` [PATCH v2] x86: fix section mismatch warning - spp_getpage() Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080815163212.GA5408@joi \
--to=marcin.slusarz@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.