From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86_64 : support atomic ops with 64 bits integer values
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 03:39:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080816073926.GA19546@Krystal> (raw)
x86_64 add/sub atomic ops does not seems to accept integer values bigger
than 32 bits as immediates. Intel's add/sub documentation specifies they
have to be passed as registers.
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.0/gcc/Machine-Constraints.html#Machine-Constraints
states :
e
32-bit signed integer constant, or a symbolic reference known to fit that range (for immediate operands in sign-extending x86-64 instructions).
Z
32-bit unsigned integer constant, or a symbolic reference known to fit that range (for immediate operands in zero-extending x86-64 instructions).
Since add/sub does sign extension, using the "e" constraint seems appropriate.
It applies to 2.6.27-rc, 2.6.26, 2.6.25...
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
CC: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
---
include/asm-x86/atomic_64.h | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6-lttng/include/asm-x86/atomic_64.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/include/asm-x86/atomic_64.h 2008-08-16 03:19:35.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6-lttng/include/asm-x86/atomic_64.h 2008-08-16 03:21:18.000000000 -0400
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static inline void atomic64_add(long i,
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "addq %1,%0"
: "=m" (v->counter)
- : "ir" (i), "m" (v->counter));
+ : "er" (i), "m" (v->counter));
}
/**
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static inline void atomic64_sub(long i,
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "subq %1,%0"
: "=m" (v->counter)
- : "ir" (i), "m" (v->counter));
+ : "er" (i), "m" (v->counter));
}
/**
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static inline int atomic64_sub_and_test(
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "subq %2,%0; sete %1"
: "=m" (v->counter), "=qm" (c)
- : "ir" (i), "m" (v->counter) : "memory");
+ : "er" (i), "m" (v->counter) : "memory");
return c;
}
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static inline int atomic64_add_negative(
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "addq %2,%0; sets %1"
: "=m" (v->counter), "=qm" (c)
- : "ir" (i), "m" (v->counter) : "memory");
+ : "er" (i), "m" (v->counter) : "memory");
return c;
}
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next reply other threads:[~2008-08-16 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-16 7:39 Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2008-08-16 15:04 ` [PATCH] x86_64 : support atomic ops with 64 bits integer values H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-16 15:43 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-16 17:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-16 21:19 ` [RFC PATCH] Fair rwlock Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-16 21:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-17 7:53 ` [RFC PATCH] Fair low-latency rwlock v3 Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-17 16:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-17 19:10 ` [RFC PATCH] Fair low-latency rwlock v5 Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-17 21:30 ` [RFC PATCH] Fair low-latency rwlock v5 (updated benchmarks) Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-18 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH] Fair low-latency rwlock v5 Linus Torvalds
2008-08-18 23:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-19 6:04 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-19 7:33 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-19 9:06 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-19 16:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-21 20:50 ` [RFC PATCH] Writer-biased low-latency rwlock v8 Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-21 21:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-21 21:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-21 22:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-23 5:09 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-23 18:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-23 20:30 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-23 21:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-21 21:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-21 21:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-25 19:20 ` [RFC PATCH] Fair low-latency rwlock v5 Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080816073926.GA19546@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.