All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] BUILD_BUG_ON sucks
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 20:55:44 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808162055.45136.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080816100948.GB19926@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru>

On Saturday 16 August 2008 20:09:48 Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> BUILD_BUG_ON should have never existed -- BUG_ON could upgrade itself to
> compile-breaking version if compiler has enough information and this is
> what patch does.
>
> The only downside is that one can't write BUG_ON(1) anymore.

Interesting idea, but I've come to actually like the semantic explicitness of 
BUILD_BUG_ON.  There's a difference between "we should never get here" 
and "this should never exist".

But maybe I just like it because we have it.  At very least BUILD_BUG_ON 
should definitely compile-barf on a non-constant expr, and vice versa for 
BUG_ON().

Note that BUG_ON() is a hack caused by lack of attribute((cold)).  "if (x) 
BUG()" is clearer, and possible in the long run as people upgrade compilers.

Cheers,
Rusty.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-16 10:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-16 10:09 [PATCH] BUILD_BUG_ON sucks Alexey Dobriyan
2008-08-16 10:55 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2008-08-16 20:07   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-17 10:32     ` [PATCH] debug: fix BUILD_BUG_ON() for non-constant expressions Ingo Molnar
2008-08-17 16:56       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-17 17:33         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-17 17:53           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-17 18:39           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-17 18:45             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-18  1:09           ` Rusty Russell
2008-08-18  7:54             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-18  9:55               ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-08-18 12:32                 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-08-19 13:34                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-19 16:33                   ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-08-20 10:59                     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-20 12:31                       ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-08-20 12:39                         ` adobriyan
2008-08-20 13:07                           ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-08-21 12:17                         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-25  1:19                     ` Rusty Russell
2008-08-20 13:21       ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-08-16 17:46 ` [PATCH] BUILD_BUG_ON sucks Andrew Morton
2008-08-17 12:19   ` Theodore Tso
2008-08-17 16:33     ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200808162055.45136.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.