From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: [PATCH] xenfb: make restartable Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 23:33:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20080816223300.GD4092@implementation> References: <48A4232B.6040500@redhat.com> <20080814122931.GL4590@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <48A43EAD.7040701@redhat.com> <20080814142849.GS4590@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <48A44967.4060401@redhat.com> <20080814151359.GT4590@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <20080814180251.GD4590@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <20080815222346.GE5198@implementation> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Markus Armbruster Cc: Xen Development Mailing List , Gerd Hoffmann List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Markus Armbruster, le Fri 15 Aug 2008 18:53:01 -0400, a =E9crit : > We need to make up our mind how to handle invalid state transitions. >=20 > Is silently ignoring guest misbehavior smart? I'd rather log it. Why not indeed, but beware of logging too much. Samuel