From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:17:41 +0100 (BST) Received: from ditditdahdahdah-dahditditditdit.dl5rb.org.uk ([217.169.26.26]:9186 "EHLO ditditdahdahdah-dahdahdahditdit.dl5rb.org.uk") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S28574097AbYHSJRe (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:17:34 +0100 Received: from denk.linux-mips.net (denk.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by ditditdahdahdah-dahdahdahditdit.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m7J9HVRS027388; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:17:31 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by denk.linux-mips.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m7J9HTft027385; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:17:29 +0100 Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:17:29 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Patrick Glass Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [MIPS] msp71xx: resolve compilation problem in msp_setup.c Message-ID: <20080819091729.GA27342@linux-mips.org> References: <20080818212812.GA28692@linux-mips.org> <16B817FC3FB4A540BD8003EA6004CE7101A9FDD8@BBY1EXM09.pmc_nt.nt.pmc-sierra.bc.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16B817FC3FB4A540BD8003EA6004CE7101A9FDD8@BBY1EXM09.pmc_nt.nt.pmc-sierra.bc.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 20253 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 04:11:13PM -0700, Patrick Glass wrote: > Hi, > I have attempted to submit a new patch for msp71xx which enables gpio > access through the new gpio framework. Hopefully it should propogate > throught the list soon... if I have not messed up (It's my first patch > for linux-mips). Also we have a newer msp_setup that removes the gpio > calls altogether. I will cleanup our msp_setup.c file and create a new > patch that can replace this patch if that's ok with you. Of course. Ralf