From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move sysctl check into debugging section and don't make it default y
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:40:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080821064009.GB18831@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1myj63neb.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org>
> What is a feature change like this doing coming in after the
> merge window?
I considered it a "anti bloat bugfix". Adding 30k of
object code to allno was a bit too much.
> Why doesn't an allnoconfig disable sysctl all together?
Because it depends on EMBEDDED and EMBEDDED is not y. Yes it's not
intuitive, on the other hand the end result is reasonable.
> These are the only checks we have against someone doing something
> nasty in the sysctl hierarchy. We have proven that we don't
> have the discipline to do the right thing with code in the
> core kernel. I expect out of tree code will be much worse.
My assumption is that they will be run at least once during
a release cycle by someone and then the messages will appear
and be reported. We do the same thing with a lot of other
debug options (lockdep, slab debug, sleep debug etc.,). There's no
need for this one to be special.
Also I'm not sure the check is all that useful anyways. We
should just not accept any new binary numbered sysctl, and
that's nearly the case anyways.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-21 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-16 5:53 [PATCH] Move sysctl check into debugging section and don't make it default y Andi Kleen
2008-08-21 6:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-08-21 6:40 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-08-21 8:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-08-21 18:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-08-22 1:57 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-22 2:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080821064009.GB18831@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.