From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11391] New: Kernel NULL pointer dereference in do_notify_parent() Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:58:15 -0500 Message-ID: <20080821215815.GA19191@us.ibm.com> References: <20080821092322.76621dab.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080821092322.76621dab.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org, stable-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, bugme-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, robert.rex-GD4dBWQXeU/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Quoting Andrew Morton (akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org): > > (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the > bugzilla web interface). > > On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 05:58:52 -0700 (PDT) bugme-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org wrote: > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11391 > > > > Summary: Kernel NULL pointer dereference in do_notify_parent() > > Product: Process Management > > Version: 2.5 > > KernelVersion: 2.6.26.3 > > Should have been 2.6.26.4? > > > Platform: All > > OS/Version: Linux > > Tree: Mainline > > Status: NEW > > Severity: normal > > Priority: P1 > > Component: Other > > AssignedTo: process_other-ztI5WcYan/vQLgFONoPN62D2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org > > ReportedBy: robert.rex-GD4dBWQXeU/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org > > > > > > Latest working kernel version: 2.6.26.3 > > > > Earliest failing kernel version: 2.6.25.4 (didn't test with former kernels) I'm sorry, I'm confused. Which kernel version exactly fails? I don't see 2.6.26.4 on kernel.org, and Linus' tree (just pulled) doesn't fail for me. thanks, -serge