From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Shawn O. Pearce" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "Convert output messages in merge-recursive to past tense." Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:03:46 -0700 Message-ID: <20080822230346.GN3483@spearce.org> References: <1219425524-77545-1-git-send-email-maillist@steelskies.com> <7v7ia87k2e.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Jonathan del Strother , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Aug 23 01:04:52 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KWfgX-00061p-J6 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 01:04:50 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754720AbYHVXDs (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:03:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754325AbYHVXDs (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:03:48 -0400 Received: from george.spearce.org ([209.20.77.23]:41680 "EHLO george.spearce.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754653AbYHVXDr (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:03:47 -0400 Received: by george.spearce.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D73C738375; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 23:03:46 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7v7ia87k2e.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jonathan del Strother writes: > > > Now that the progress meter is gone, merge messages make more sense when presented in present tense > > > > This reverts commit 89f40be294363ce4d14ed6931a65561a4e8e9140. > > > > Conflicts: > > > > builtin-merge-recursive.c > > --- > > "Conflicts:"? Please either remove it or describe how you resolved the > conflicts. The conflicts are likely because this was run with git-revert and a few hunks had to be manually merged. The result of the patch looks fine to me. But the "Conflicts" part of the message is likely not interesting here. > Sign-off? > > The patch looked Ok to me. Shawn? Acked-by: Shawn O. Pearce -- Shawn.