From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Work around dhclient brokenness
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:01:17 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808251401.18209.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080819150555.GA15995@puku.stupidest.org>
On Wednesday 20 August 2008 01:05:55 Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 07:10:44PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > We need both. CSUM2 is the new virtio-level feature.
>
> Perhaps that's what I'm misisng. How is this different to CSUM?
Because current guests which say they can handle CSUM can't *really* handle
it. That's the entire point. We need a new one, so that existing guests
don't ack it (because they don't understand it), and new guests can ack it
later.
Hope that clarifies,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-25 4:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-15 19:47 [PATCH] Work around dhclient brokenness Anthony Liguori
2008-08-18 10:56 ` Avi Kivity
2008-08-18 11:01 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-18 11:06 ` Avi Kivity
2008-08-18 11:34 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-18 11:40 ` Avi Kivity
2008-08-18 11:44 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-18 12:15 ` Avi Kivity
2008-08-19 0:45 ` Rusty Russell
2008-08-19 3:17 ` Chris Wedgwood
2008-08-19 4:41 ` Rusty Russell
2008-08-19 5:13 ` Chris Wedgwood
2008-08-19 5:17 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-19 5:28 ` Chris Wedgwood
2008-08-19 9:10 ` Rusty Russell
2008-08-19 15:05 ` Chris Wedgwood
2008-08-25 4:01 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2008-08-19 9:08 ` Rusty Russell
2008-08-19 9:56 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-19 11:36 ` Rusty Russell
2008-08-19 23:35 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-08-19 9:12 ` Avi Kivity
2008-08-19 13:42 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-08-19 13:50 ` Avi Kivity
2008-08-19 13:54 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-08-19 14:00 ` Avi Kivity
2008-08-24 8:39 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200808251401.18209.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markmc@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.