From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: latest -git: WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/ipi.c:123 send_IPI_mask_bitmask+0xc3/0xe0()
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:36:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080825203649.GH26610@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080825195029.GA27030@redhat.com>
> On some systems (for which there aren't BIOS updates) the trip points are
> set too low.
There were patches floating to make this configurable. I was always
a little sceptical of them, but they exist.
> If we get a thermal event that was caused by temporary
> increased workload, temperature will drop off again when that workload
> is complete.
But none of the cpufreq governours do this. They only care about
load, not about temperature.
> For sustained workloads we'd get additional thermal events, at which
> time we make a decision "ok, we've throttled as far as we can, and
> things are still going badly, power off".
That is what the ACPI driver does when the trip point is reached.
> In the event of a failed fan or similar, shutting down is obviously
> the right thing to do, and we'd get further thermal events after
> throttling which would allow us to do so.
So you're saying processor_thermal should let the system cook
for some time first before really taking action?
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-25 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-19 19:51 latest -git: WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/ipi.c:123 send_IPI_mask_bitmask+0xc3/0xe0() Vegard Nossum
2008-08-20 1:39 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-20 6:26 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-22 0:36 ` Dave Jones
2008-08-22 2:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-22 2:28 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-22 6:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-22 9:35 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-22 16:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-23 6:42 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-23 6:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-22 11:13 ` adobriyan
2008-08-24 9:20 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-24 16:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-24 17:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-24 17:22 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-24 17:45 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-24 17:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-24 18:13 ` Dave Jones
2008-08-25 18:31 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-25 18:38 ` Dave Jones
2008-08-25 18:36 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-25 18:54 ` Dave Jones
2008-08-25 19:39 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-25 19:50 ` Dave Jones
2008-08-25 20:36 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-08-25 20:47 ` Dave Jones
2008-08-25 21:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-25 19:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-25 19:13 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080825203649.GH26610@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.