All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>
Cc: vegard.nossum@gmail.com, zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com,
	hmh@hmh.eng.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH] leds: fix oops race in led trigger registration
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:36:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080826143657.7192afdf.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1219306014.5385.9.camel@dax.rpnet.com>

On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:06:54 +0100
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 09:17 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> > I resubmit this, which was posted a month ago, with no responses from
> > the maintainer (and no recent fixes in this area either). I have not
> > tested it myself, but I am reasonably confident that this is an
> > obviously correct fix. I guess it would not hurt to exercise it as well.
> > 
> > Zdenek: Have recent kernels also been showing this behaviour? Did the
> > patch fix the problem for you? You said something about a new issue
> > showing up, do you think that was related to this patch?
> > 
> > Also, just one question (since I'm newbie at this): Is it dangerous to
> > register the &dev_attr_trigger device file before we put the device on
> > the list or initialize it completely? If so, the initialization should
> > probably be moved all to the top before the file is made public.
> 
> This patch isn't quite right since whilst it fixes one race, it opens up
> a number of other potential problems. We definitely should have the led
> listed in leds_list before calling the various functions and the
> existing init order is correct in that sense.
> 
> I suspect your problem is caused by something calling a trigger
> registration between the point its added to the list and the
> init_rwsem(). The best solution is to move the init_rwsem() to earlier
> in the function. Yes, that means some ifdef ugliness but so be it. Could
> you see whether you still see the problem with the patch below?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/led-class.c b/drivers/leds/led-class.c
> index 559a408..c9d8219 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/led-class.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/led-class.c
> @@ -113,6 +113,9 @@ int led_classdev_register(struct device *parent, struct led_classdev *led_cdev)
>  	if (rc)
>  		goto err_out;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGERS
> +	init_rwsem(&led_cdev->trigger_lock);
> +#endif
>  	/* add to the list of leds */
>  	down_write(&leds_list_lock);
>  	list_add_tail(&led_cdev->node, &leds_list);
> @@ -121,8 +124,6 @@ int led_classdev_register(struct device *parent, struct led_classdev *led_cdev)
>  	led_update_brightness(led_cdev);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGERS
> -	init_rwsem(&led_cdev->trigger_lock);
> -
>  	rc = device_create_file(led_cdev->dev, &dev_attr_trigger);
>  	if (rc)
>  		goto err_out_led_list;
> 

??


      reply	other threads:[~2008-08-26 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-21  7:17 [RESEND][RFC][PATCH] leds: fix oops race in led trigger registration Vegard Nossum
2008-08-21  8:06 ` Richard Purdie
2008-08-26 21:36   ` Andrew Morton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080826143657.7192afdf.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
    --cc=zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.