From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: fix nfs_parse_ip_address() corner case
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:45:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080826204510.GP4380@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65DB0052-AF44-4FA1-8B50-6DB5E31692B3@oracle.com>
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 04:36:10PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Aug 26, 2008, at Aug 26, 2008, 4:28 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 04:24:12PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>> On Aug 26, 2008, at Aug 26, 2008, 2:39 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 02:24:22PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>>>> Bruce observed that nfs_parse_ip_address() will successfully parse
>>>>> an IPv6
>>>>> address that looks like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> "::1%"
>>>>>
>>>>> A scope delimiter is present, but there is no scope ID following
>>>>> it.
>>>>> This is harmless, as it would simply set the scope ID to zero.
>>>>> However,
>>>>> in some cases we would like to flag this as an improperly formed
>>>>> address.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> fs/nfs/super.c | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
>>>>> 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/super.c b/fs/nfs/super.c
>>>>> index 5b2aa04..f73e068 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/nfs/super.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/nfs/super.c
>>>>> @@ -727,19 +727,21 @@ static void nfs_parse_ipv4_address(char
>>>>> *string, size_t str_len,
>>>>> #define IPV6_SCOPE_DELIMITER '%'
>>>>>
>>>>> #if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
>>>>> -static void nfs_parse_ipv6_scope_id(const char *string, const
>>>>> size_t str_len,
>>>>> - const char *delim,
>>>>> - struct sockaddr_in6 *sin6)
>>>>> +static int nfs_parse_ipv6_scope_id(const char *string, const
>>>>> size_t
>>>>> str_len,
>>>>> + const char *delim,
>>>>> + struct sockaddr_in6 *sin6)
>>>>> {
>>>>> char *p;
>>>>> size_t len;
>>>>>
>>>>> if (!(ipv6_addr_type(&sin6->sin6_addr) & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL))
>>>>> - return ;
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>> if (*delim != IPV6_SCOPE_DELIMITER)
>>>>> - return;
>>>>> -
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>
>>>> What happens in the case where there's no scope delimiter? In that
>>>> case
>>>> can't *delim correctly point to something else here?
>>>
>>> When we get to nfs_parse_ipv6_scope_id(), *delim points to the first
>>> character following the 128-bit IPv6 address string. We should fail
>>> if
>>> *delim doesn't point to either '%' or '\0'. So we need another check
>>> here -- succeed immediately if *delim points to '\0'.
>>
>> The string isn't necessarily null-delimited.
>
> OK, we just need to take str_len into account.
OK. A minor nit, but I'd also find this a little easier to read if it
attempted to stick to the pattern
if (something_bad)
fail;
if (something_else_bad)
fail;
...
succeed;
rather than
if (successful) {
if (still_successful) {
...
succeed;
}
}
fail;
--b.
>
>>> Then, I think we should check if the address is link-local _after_ we
>>> know we have a valid scope delimiter.
>>>
>>>> Arguably kstrndup() and dev_get_by_name() failures should also
>>>> result
>>>> in
>>>> parser failures. It seems safer to me to reject bad addresses
>>>> than to
>>>> try to use them anyway (possibly resulting in mounting a different
>>>> server from what was intended).
>>>
>>> Well, if kstrndup() fails, that doesn't necessarily mean we have a
>>> bad
>>> address; simply that there wasn't memory to parse it. But it's
>>> reasonable to return 0 in that case.
>>>
>>> If dev_get_by_name() fails, then the next step is to check if we were
>>> passed a numeric value instead of a device name. If the strtoul()
>>> call
>>> fails to find a real numeric there, then yes, address parsing should
>>> fail.
>>
>> What does %numeric-value mean?
>
> '%eth0' means find and use the scope ID of the eth0 device. '%2' means
> use the scope ID 2. If eth0 has a interface index of 2, then both of
> these are equivalent. The numeric index is the scope ID.
>
> --
> Chuck Lever
> chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-26 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-22 18:24 [PATCH] NFS: fix nfs_parse_ip_address() corner case Chuck Lever
[not found] ` <20080822182419.19572.34705.stgit-meopP2rzCrTwdl/1UfZZQIVfYA8g3rJ/@public.gmane.org>
2008-08-26 18:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-08-26 20:24 ` Chuck Lever
2008-08-26 20:28 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-08-26 20:36 ` Chuck Lever
2008-08-26 20:45 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-03 20:35 Chuck Lever
[not found] ` <20080903203414.3322.97607.stgit-lQeC5l55kZ7wdl/1UfZZQIVfYA8g3rJ/@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-04 20:23 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-09-04 21:36 ` Chuck Lever
[not found] ` <76bd70e30809041436y4a8fc1d2hb8230cb7aba17f26-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-05 21:58 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080826204510.GP4380@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.