From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@eu.citrix.com>
To: Fang Yuming <fangyuming@emails.bjut.edu.cn>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] About the differences between Version 3.3 and Version 3.0
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:56:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080828135632.GT4523@implementation.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6138CCD83C6244738B8327DCAC94CECF@ff76d11953be449>
Fang Yuming, le Thu 28 Aug 2008 21:49:29 +0800, a écrit :
> >> Do these codes include the algorithm processing disk requests from
> >> different domains?
> >
> > No, Xen just lets linux do that, in block/*iosched.c
>
> Does this mean that I should modify the dom0(linux) kernel( in block/*iosched.c) if I want to do some experiments
> about the disk scheduling algorithm of virtual disk scheduling algorithm?
Since that's the component that does it, yes.
> >> 3. I found the newest Version is Version 3.3, can anyone tell me the majors differences between
> >> Version 3.3 and Version 3.0?
> >
> > See the announces of 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3.
> >
> >> And is there any change in the part of virtual disk, especially the
> >> scheduling alogithm of different disk requests from domains?
> >
> > Again, that's just dom0's Linux matter.
>
> From your answers, I know that if I want to do some research on virtual disk schedling algorithm, I should
> modify the disk scheduling part of linux kernel and it is no need to change other parts of Xen?
Indeed. You may want to make the block backend provide the domid to the
io scheduler for e.q. better fairness, however.
Samuel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-28 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <419869332.17872@bjut.edu.cn>
2008-08-28 1:48 ` [SPAM] About the differences between Version 3.3 and Version 3.0 Fang Yuming
2008-08-28 1:48 ` Fang Yuming
2008-08-28 8:51 ` Samuel Thibault
[not found] ` <419931538.27194@bjut.edu.cn>
2008-08-28 13:49 ` [SPAM] " Fang Yuming
2008-08-28 13:49 ` Fang Yuming
2008-08-28 13:56 ` Samuel Thibault [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080828135632.GT4523@implementation.uk.xensource.com \
--to=samuel.thibault@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=fangyuming@emails.bjut.edu.cn \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.