From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:08:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20080829170851.GZ26610@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20080829154237.1196.66825.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <87abevpzv7.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <48B81F60.3080409@gmail.com> <20080829162216.GW26610@one.firstfloor.org> <48B823F6.1010509@novell.com> <20080829163749.GX26610@one.firstfloor.org> <48B826BD.9000308@novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andi Kleen , Gregory Haskins , mingo@elte.hu, rostedt@goodmis.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org To: Gregory Haskins Return-path: Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:54892 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757519AbYH2RGK (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:06:10 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48B826BD.9000308@novell.com> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: No idea on the problem itself because I don't understand it, just: > Given that, we either need to address the const requirement > for userspace, alter userspace's usage, or find another way to address > the deadlock. Any ideas? In the worst case you can always disable the vsyscall gtod() and thus the need for a user space safe seqlock_t, but it will hurt some workloads significantly. -Andi