Re: pack count on repo.or.cz [was "Medium term dreams"]

[Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>]

On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 07:54:24AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> So did you check for loose objects? That is what you should get if there
> were any objects that would have been lost. If there aren't any new
> loose objects, then there were no objects that would be lost.

Before:

rover:/srv/git/git.git# l objects~/??/* | wc -l
3343
rover:/srv/git/git.git# l objects~/pack/* | wc -l
750

After:

rover:/srv/git/git.git# l objects/??/* | wc -l
2920
rover:/srv/git/git.git# l objects/pack/* | wc -l
590

> As to why the other packs weren't pruned, I don't know. In my example,
> you can see that the pruning happens as we expect. So either there is a
> bug in git-prune-packed, or there is something we're not realizing.

Well, that's my question here. :-)

If you're still interested in looking into this further, you can wget -r
or rsync over the git.git repository from repo.or.cz.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
The next generation of interesting software will be done
on the Macintosh, not the IBM PC.  -- Bill Gates