From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zombie2.ncsc.mil (zombie2.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.133]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m83E6BjN019223 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:06:12 -0400 Received: from g5t0008.atlanta.hp.com (jazzdrum.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.7]) by zombie2.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m83E5ZFh003228 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 14:05:35 GMT From: Paul Moore To: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/14] Labeled networking patches for 2.6.28 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:05:59 -0400 References: <20080903003647.15669.45349.stgit@flek.lan> In-Reply-To: <20080903003647.15669.45349.stgit@flek.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <200809031005.59102.paul.moore@hp.com> Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Tuesday 02 September 2008 8:48:41 pm Paul Moore wrote: > Since I'm reasonable certain there are no really nasty regressions, > I've added sign-offs to all the patches now. I expect there will > probably be another spin or two to take care of bugs yet to be found > and fix other various things that pop-up (maybe even the Smack stuff > if I can find the time) but the patches are in reasonably good shape > right now. I also did a test merge/compile with the September 2nd > linux-next tree and there were no nasty surprises so I'm also pushing > these patches to my lblnet-2.6_next tree which means you should see > them in tomorrow's linux-next tree if all goes well. Just an FYI, it looks like I may have missed the cut for the September 3rd linux-next tree. The patches should be in there for tomorrow's tree. -- paul moore linux @ hp -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Moore Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/14] Labeled networking patches for 2.6.28 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:05:59 -0400 Message-ID: <200809031005.59102.paul.moore@hp.com> References: <20080903003647.15669.45349.stgit@flek.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080903003647.15669.45349.stgit@flek.lan> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-security-module-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 02 September 2008 8:48:41 pm Paul Moore wrote: > Since I'm reasonable certain there are no really nasty regressions, > I've added sign-offs to all the patches now. I expect there will > probably be another spin or two to take care of bugs yet to be found > and fix other various things that pop-up (maybe even the Smack stuff > if I can find the time) but the patches are in reasonably good shape > right now. I also did a test merge/compile with the September 2nd > linux-next tree and there were no nasty surprises so I'm also pushing > these patches to my lblnet-2.6_next tree which means you should see > them in tomorrow's linux-next tree if all goes well. Just an FYI, it looks like I may have missed the cut for the September 3rd linux-next tree. The patches should be in there for tomorrow's tree. -- paul moore linux @ hp