From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755268AbYICTcV (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2008 15:32:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752441AbYICTcJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2008 15:32:09 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:52457 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752233AbYICTcI (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2008 15:32:08 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 12:32:02 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Andi Kleen Cc: andi@firstfloor.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [1/2] Add a SYSTEM_PANIC state Message-Id: <20080903123202.91e8ce4d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080903191650.GV18288@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20080902349.573187695@firstfloor.org> <20080902134922.9401F3E6A00@basil.firstfloor.org> <20080903120423.9e00557c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080903191650.GV18288@one.firstfloor.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 21:16:51 +0200 Andi Kleen wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 12:04:23PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 15:49:22 +0200 (CEST) > > Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > --- linux.orig/include/linux/kernel.h > > > +++ linux/include/linux/kernel.h > > > @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ extern enum system_states { > > > SYSTEM_POWER_OFF, > > > SYSTEM_RESTART, > > > SYSTEM_SUSPEND_DISK, > > > + SYSTEM_PANIC, > > > } system_state; > > > > system_state is such a crock. I wonder what other random code all over > > the place is looking at system_state and will get unexpectedly broken > > by other "unrelated" changes such as this.. > > >From a quick grep none. > > Also I think it's a natural extension. > > > > > > > It's not a heck of a lot nicer, but we could do this: > > Sorry but I think it's far worse. How do you think it's > better? > For the reason which I stated and which you carefully deleted prior to asking my reason. Sheesh.