From: Nye Liu <nyet@nyet.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nyet@mrv.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] INITRAMFS: Add option to preserve mtime from INITRAMFS cpio images
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 15:41:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080903224130.GA16630@curtisfong.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080903152231.6b82d9bf.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 03:22:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 13:29:38 -0700
> > Signed-off-by: Nye Liu <nyet@nyet.org>
> >
> > diff --git a/init/initramfs.c b/init/initramfs.c
> > index 644fc01..ebfc049 100644
> > --- a/init/initramfs.c
> > +++ b/init/initramfs.c
> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > #include <linux/delay.h>
> > #include <linux/string.h>
> > #include <linux/syscalls.h>
> > +#include <linux/utime.h>
> >
> > static __initdata char *message;
> > static void __init error(char *x)
> > @@ -72,6 +73,38 @@ static void __init free_hash(void)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static __initdata LIST_HEAD(dir_list);
> > +struct dir_entry {
> > + struct list_head list;
> > + char *name;
> > + struct utimbuf mtime;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void __init dir_add(const char *name, struct utimbuf mtime)
> > +{
> > + struct dir_entry *de = kmalloc(sizeof(struct dir_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!de)
> > + panic("can't allocate dir_entry buffer");
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&de->list);
> > + de->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + de->mtime = mtime;
> > + list_add(&de->list, &dir_list);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void __init dir_utime(void)
> > +{
> > + struct list_head *e, *tmp;
> > + list_for_each_safe(e, tmp, &dir_list) {
> > + struct dir_entry *de = list_entry(e, struct dir_entry, list);
> > + list_del(e);
> > + sys_utime(de->name, &de->mtime);
>
> gargh. Why does this work? It's normally a big fail to pass a kernel
> address into a system call. I guess we're running under KERNEL_DS here
> and getname() and strncpy_from_user() did the right thing.
Possibly, i was not aware of that limitation :( I'll look into it
> On what CPU architecture was this tested?
ppc and powerpc
> Wouldn't it be simpler to put a timespec into struct dir_entry then go
> direct to do_utimes() here?
No, if i understand your question correctly. I have to do the mtime
modifications in two passes (see last comment below)
>
> > + kfree(de->name);
> > + kfree(de);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static __initdata struct utimbuf mtime;
> > +
> > /* cpio header parsing */
> >
> > static __initdata unsigned long ino, major, minor, nlink;
> > @@ -97,6 +130,7 @@ static void __init parse_header(char *s)
> > uid = parsed[2];
> > gid = parsed[3];
> > nlink = parsed[4];
> > + mtime.actime = mtime.modtime = parsed[5];
> > body_len = parsed[6];
> > major = parsed[7];
> > minor = parsed[8];
> > @@ -130,6 +164,7 @@ static inline void __init eat(unsigned n)
> > count -= n;
> > }
> >
> > +static __initdata char *vcollected;
> > static __initdata char *collected;
> > static __initdata int remains;
> > static __initdata char *collect;
> > @@ -271,6 +306,7 @@ static int __init do_name(void)
> > if (wfd >= 0) {
> > sys_fchown(wfd, uid, gid);
> > sys_fchmod(wfd, mode);
> > + vcollected = kstrdup(collected, GFP_KERNEL);
> > state = CopyFile;
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -278,12 +314,14 @@ static int __init do_name(void)
> > sys_mkdir(collected, mode);
> > sys_chown(collected, uid, gid);
> > sys_chmod(collected, mode);
> > + dir_add(collected, mtime);
> > } else if (S_ISBLK(mode) || S_ISCHR(mode) ||
> > S_ISFIFO(mode) || S_ISSOCK(mode)) {
> > if (maybe_link() == 0) {
> > sys_mknod(collected, mode, rdev);
> > sys_chown(collected, uid, gid);
> > sys_chmod(collected, mode);
> > + sys_utime(collected, &mtime);
> > }
> > }
> > return 0;
> > @@ -294,6 +332,8 @@ static int __init do_copy(void)
> > if (count >= body_len) {
> > sys_write(wfd, victim, body_len);
> > sys_close(wfd);
> > + sys_utime(vcollected, &mtime);
>
> and here?
see below regarding two passes.
> > + kfree(vcollected);
> > eat(body_len);
> > state = SkipIt;
> > return 0;
> > @@ -305,12 +345,26 @@ static int __init do_copy(void)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static long __init do_lutime(char __user *filename,
> > + struct utimbuf __user *times)
> > +{
> > + struct timespec t[2];
> > +
> > + t[0].tv_sec = times->actime;
> > + t[0].tv_nsec = 0;
> > + t[1].tv_sec = times->modtime;
> > + t[1].tv_nsec = 0;
> > +
> > + return do_utimes(AT_FDCWD, filename, t, AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int __init do_symlink(void)
> > {
> > collected[N_ALIGN(name_len) + body_len] = '\0';
> > clean_path(collected, 0);
> > sys_symlink(collected + N_ALIGN(name_len), collected);
> > sys_lchown(collected, uid, gid);
> > + do_lutime(collected, &mtime);
> > state = SkipIt;
> > next_state = Reset;
> > return 0;
> > @@ -466,6 +520,7 @@ static char * __init unpack_to_rootfs(char *buf, unsigned len, int check_only)
> > buf += inptr;
> > len -= inptr;
> > }
> > + dir_utime();
>
> Perhaps this is the simplest implementation - I didn't check the fine
> details. What's your thinking here?
>
The main problem is that i need to save off the entire list for later
processing of the directory mtimes... if i process the directory mtimes
in the same pass as the file/link mtimes, touching the directory inode
when creating/modifying the file/links updates the directory mtime, and
overwrites whatever mtime i set the directory to when i created it.
The only solution is to do a two pass, which is why the list is
necessary. If there is a better way, i did not find it :(
It could be that i misunderstood your question though :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-03 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-05 19:52 [PATCH] INITRAMFS: Add option to preserve mtime from INITRAMFS cpio images Nye Liu
2008-08-16 8:58 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-03 20:29 ` Nye Liu
2008-09-03 22:22 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-03 22:31 ` Nye Liu
2008-09-03 22:36 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-04 7:11 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2008-09-04 7:13 ` nyet
2008-09-04 23:08 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-09-03 22:41 ` Nye Liu [this message]
2008-09-03 22:48 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-03 22:53 ` Nye Liu
2008-09-03 22:54 ` Nye Liu
2008-09-03 23:04 ` Nye Liu
2008-09-03 23:19 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-03 23:30 ` Nye Liu
[not found] ` <20080903164144.27c94bae.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2008-09-04 1:40 ` [PATCH] INITRAMFS: Preserve " Nye Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080903224130.GA16630@curtisfong.org \
--to=nyet@nyet.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nyet@mrv.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.