From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix build failure when compiling without TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:44:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080905084438.GA4002@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48C0D2A4.90208@st.com>
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 08:33:08AM +0200, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
> Hi All,
> playing with the kernel configuration we noticed that the
> kernel doesn't build if TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT is
> forced off. So this patch just fixes it.
>
> Anyway, we are wondering why it's not possible to disable
> this option from Kconfig.
> Reading the Documentation/irqflags-tracing.txt, this option is
> "needed for CONFIG_PROVE_SPIN_LOCKING and
> CONFIG_PROVE_RW_LOCKING to be offered by the generic
> lock debugging code."
> But we cannot find any references to PROVE_RW_LOCKING etc.
> May be removed?
>
Have you noticed this problem on non-sh platforms also? If so, you should
resend this patch to linux-kernel with the linux-sh list CCed.
The config dependencies are a bit of a mess, but it's all quite
functional. CONFIG_PROVE_RW_LOCKING is bogus though, it's actually
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING. Anyways, take a look at lib/Kconfig.debug and it
should all be pretty obvious.
TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT is used by quite a lot of things, lockdep, lock
stat, preempt debug, etc. You really do _not_ want to disable this
option, especially as it is a _support_ option, not a functional one.
CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS itself is what introduces extra overhead, and while
this depends on TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT, it also has a dependency on
DEBUG_KERNEL. Thus, you will never see any of this stuff with kernel
debugging disabled. Most of this stuff is hidden away from the user in
Kconfig for a good reason :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-05 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-05 6:33 [PATCH] fix build failure when compiling without TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT Giuseppe CAVALLARO
2008-09-05 8:44 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2008-09-05 11:35 ` Giuseppe CAVALLARO
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080905084438.GA4002@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.