From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753168AbYIEUb2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2008 16:31:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751628AbYIEUbT (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2008 16:31:19 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:43639 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751448AbYIEUbT (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2008 16:31:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 22:31:00 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Robert Richter Cc: Vegard Nossum , Pavel Machek , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Philippe Elie , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: oprofile + hibernation = badness Message-ID: <20080905203100.GA24193@elte.hu> References: <19f34abd0808181332k3c02496auabd04e927bb7cab5@mail.gmail.com> <48AA1E42.6070802@linux.intel.com> <20080901163452.GD6588@erda.amd.com> <20080905175827.GE27395@elte.hu> <20080905185907.GI5417@erda.amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080905185907.GI5417@erda.amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Robert Richter wrote: > On 05.09.08 19:58:29, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > this fix (commit id 1404e403) is not yet upstream for v2.6.27. Could > > > this be added to the next pull request? > > > > it's already upstream, as commit 80a8c9fffa. I've zapped the duplicate > > 1404e403 from x86/oprofile. > > Ah, I stumbled other this because it is still listed in the shortlog: > > $ git shortlog linux-2.6/master..tip/master | grep oprofile > x86: fix oprofile + hibernation badness > ... yeah - it's still in the integration branch - but it doesnt hurt as it's same-content patch (it got cherry-picked over into an urgent branch). The duplication should go away on the next tip/master integration run (tomorrow-ish) - please let me know if it doesnt. Ingo