From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754661AbYIFTTT (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2008 15:19:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752224AbYIFTTL (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2008 15:19:11 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]:21460 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752150AbYIFTTK (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2008 15:19:10 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=bnpaIip0q06QY9jNbfvMF1RruZys8pFWLdaHgZXHvoogASMSLaj9h86VF8bIF4d1hd yvapAIQageJPw/NmbCsP8FHj2PQQPlPX62k8gt539xcQd9PhWOF3MqnFdCExthFwl+9L CGKa1guvwlB7ii1H9nn7B7AV2+5FylnTqPWb8= Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 23:19:03 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Yinghai Lu Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Ingo Molnar , hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] x86: io-apic - code style cleaning for setup_IO_APIC_irqs Message-ID: <20080906191903.GB23729@lenovo> References: <48c02b6a.0637560a.15e9.ffffa39d@mx.google.com> <20080905080447.GC12409@elte.hu> <20080905180126.GA19334@lenovo> <20080905181111.GG27395@elte.hu> <20080905183347.GB19334@lenovo> <20080905183835.GA19215@elte.hu> <20080906101533.GA7273@lenovo> <20080906190446.GA23729@lenovo> <86802c440809061216n5bbad56amabf9934f8bf08d57@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86802c440809061216n5bbad56amabf9934f8bf08d57@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Yinghai Lu - Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 12:16:28PM -0700] | On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: | > [Maciej W. Rozycki - Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 07:45:08PM +0100] | > | On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: | > | | > | > Ingo, how about the following approach? We don't introduce new | > | > functions but rather srink the code by new printout form. | > | | > | Honestly, this one should probably use sprintf() or suchlike to avoid the | > | mess of printk() calls building a line of output from pieces. It's quite | > | easy to calculate here what the maximum size of the buffer required could | > | be and automatic arrays can have variable size, so no need for the hassle | > | of heap management. Calls to printk() without a trailing newline should | > | be avoided where possible as it messes up logging priority if a message | > | pops up from an interrupt inbetween. | > | | > | Maciej | > | | > | > The easiest way would be just print this info on separate | > lines like | > | > IO-APIC (apicid-pin) 1-1 not connected | > | > and just drop all this troubles :) | > | > I'm not sure how much memory we need for every io-apic | > pins - iirc there only 32 redirection entry so it could | > be about 32 bytes from stack would be enough. Will take | > a look. Thanks Maciej! Ingo? | | no. some system could have 3 or 4 ioapic controller, and every one | have 24...(like three mcp55/io55) | 4*24 | | or old system have 1 8111 and 7 8132. will have 32 + 7*2*7 | | YH | yep, I just calculated - we've to allocate too much for early init. - Cyrill -