From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Julius Volz <juliusv@google.com>
Cc: lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"Siim Põder" <siim@p6drad-teel.net>,
"Julian Anastasov" <ja@ssi.bg>,
"Malcolm Turnbull" <malcolm@loadbalancer.org>,
"Vince Busam" <vbusam@google.com>,
"Herbert Xu" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [rfc 0/3] IPVS: checksum updates
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 09:22:06 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080908232203.GD13048@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f4845fc0809080832w69f8aab2q12b63e0a8f6f1fdf@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 05:32:47PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Julius Volz <juliusv@google.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> >> I'm not so concerned about IPv6 local not working for now -
> >> its a combination of two new features. And hopefully we
> >> can iron it out in the not to distant future anyway.
> >
> > Yes, probably just some minor bug...
>
> Actually, it wasn't even a kernel bug, but a configuration error - I
> was using LVS/NAT, but still had the dummy0 interface with the IPv6
> VIP configured on the real server (from the DR case). And in the local
> client case, the source address is the VIP, so the real server just
> delivered the response to itself.
>
> Now I can confirm that everything is working (without your last two
> patches and with the one removing the wrong ip_route_me_harder)!
Great!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-08 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-08 2:04 [rfc 0/3] IPVS: checksum updates Simon Horman
2008-09-08 2:04 ` [rfc 1/3] ipvs: handle PARTIAL_CHECKSUM Simon Horman
2008-09-08 7:24 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-08 7:24 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-08 9:05 ` Simon Horman
2008-09-08 9:54 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-08 9:54 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-08 2:04 ` [rfc 2/3] ipvs: Use inet_proto_csum_replace*() Simon Horman
2008-09-08 2:04 ` [rfc 3/3] ipvs: Consolidate checksuming code Simon Horman
2008-09-08 10:03 ` [rfc 0/3] IPVS: checksum updates Julius Volz
2008-09-08 10:41 ` Simon Horman
2008-09-08 11:42 ` Julius Volz
2008-09-08 11:57 ` Simon Horman
2008-09-08 12:04 ` Simon Horman
2008-09-08 12:14 ` Julius Volz
2008-09-08 12:34 ` Simon Horman
2008-09-08 13:12 ` Julius Volz
2008-09-08 13:20 ` Simon Horman
2008-09-08 13:42 ` Julius Volz
2008-09-08 15:32 ` Julius Volz
2008-09-08 23:22 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2008-09-08 23:40 ` Simon Horman
2008-09-09 9:30 ` Julius Volz
2008-09-09 11:31 ` Simon Horman
2008-09-10 17:30 ` Julius Volz
2008-09-10 23:29 ` Simon Horman
2008-09-11 13:07 ` Wensong Zhang
2008-09-11 13:45 ` Simon Horman
2008-09-11 13:55 ` Julius Volz
2008-09-11 14:43 ` Wensong Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080908232203.GD13048@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=juliusv@google.com \
--cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=malcolm@loadbalancer.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=siim@p6drad-teel.net \
--cc=vbusam@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.