From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>
Subject: Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 11:31:38 +0100
Message-ID: <20080909103137.GD31314@sirena.org.uk>
References: <48C6052D.2080203@redhat.com> <20080908.221742.02572583.davem@davemloft.net> <48C60FFC.8090109@redhat.com> <20080908.230221.101659829.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: csnook@redhat.com, rick.jones2@hp.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:1456 "EHLO
	cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751977AbYIILK4 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 9 Sep 2008 07:10:56 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080908.230221.101659829.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:02:21PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 01:56:12 -0400

> [ Please hit enter every 80 columns or so, your emails are
>   unreadable until I reformat your text by hand, thanks. ]

FWIW the problem with this and some other mails you raised this on
recently is that they're sent with format=folowed which tells the
receiving MUA that it's OK to reflow the text to fit the display.