From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756778AbYIISi2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:38:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754238AbYIISiV (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:38:21 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:52063 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753617AbYIISiU (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:38:20 -0400 From: Jarod Wilson Organization: Red Hat, Inc. To: Lennart Sorensen Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/18] linux infrared remote control drivers Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:34:59 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.1 (Linux/2.6.25.16-1.fc10.x86_64; KDE/4.1.1; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Janne Grunau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Bartelmus , Eric Sandeen , Mario Limonciello References: <1220933164-10160-1-git-send-email-jwilson@redhat.com> <200809091123.57109.jwilson@redhat.com> <20080909182710.GA31271@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> In-Reply-To: <20080909182710.GA31271@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200809091434.59647.jwilson@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 09 September 2008 14:27:10 Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 11:23:56AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > I meant to include that the ordering of the patches was more or less from > > most-used/most-tested to least-used/least-tested, and a few of the > > patches do include Tested-by: lines in them. Basically, the first four or > > five drivers probably cover the majority of users, so getting them in > > first would provide the most bang-for-your-buck. But I can certainly > > re-send with only the tested drivers after we get through the first round > > of comments, if that's preferred over my approach of putting the > > higher-prio ones to the front of the ordering. > > The soundgraph imon driver is number 8, but it works great for me, and lots > of cases include that one (at least silverstone cases). I think more > than the first 4 or 5 are in very active use. Yeah, I realized imon was much lower in the sort order after my reply there, which was a bad initial move by me, since its actually one of the ones that has definite positive testing feedback already. I believe quite a number of vendors of HTPC cases use imon lcd (or vfd) and ir combo devices. -- Jarod Wilson jarod@redhat.com