From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Lil Evil" Subject: Re: XEN Hypervisor Lines Of Code Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:48:47 +0200 Message-ID: <20080911104847.47270@gmx.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > > > Hi > > > > I was just wondering if anybody keeps a record of the LOC (privileged > LOC) in > > the XEN Hypervisor. > > I was under the (false???) impression that the Hypervisor consists of a > couple > > of tens of thousand privileged LOCs. > > I am somewhat surprised about Joanna Rutkowskas statement about the > 300k LOC > > in Xen 3.3. > > Does anybody have different (same) numbers? > > The number has been growing. For an x86 build, if I exclude IA64 and XSM > components (usually not built) I count about 200k LOC. If I further > exclude > header files (generally don't have much code in them) then I end up about > 150k LOC. > > So that's a more reasonable estimate in my opinion, at about half Joanna's > figure. Obviously this is still rather larger than historical figures for > Xen version 1 or Xen version 2. > > -- Keir > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel Hi After looking at the tree, I would say that this sounds more likely. Maybe, http://www.xen.org/xen/ deserves an updated concerning this - or the number should be removed at all to prevent confusion. thanks lIl -- Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser