From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] openssl: convert to Makefile.autotools.in and bump version to 0.9.8g
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:58:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080911135843.2c66d713@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1218605958.12416.6.camel@localhost>
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:39:18 +0200
Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 13:24 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 02:03:31PM +0200, Hans-Christian Egtvedt
> > wrote:
> > > This patch converts building of OpenSSL to use
> > > Makefile.autotools.in and bumps
> >
> > OpenSSL doesn't use autotools though, so is this a good idea?
> >
<snipp override of configure rule>
> > Once you've overriden the CONFIGURE stage, is there much benefit
> > left in using Makefile.autotools.in?
> >
>
> The Makefile is smaller now, and IMHO easier to read.
>
> Installation of man pages, info pages and header/development works
> better now.
>
> I though the autotools was not purely for autotools stuff, but a way
> to make every package simpler to read and install in a more general
> way?
>
No other comments for using Makefile.autotools.in for not autotools
packages? I still find Makefile.autotools.in much smoother than the old
style package.mk. To generalize packages must be a win-win?
--
Best regards,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-11 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-12 12:03 [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] openssl: convert to Makefile.autotools.in and bump version to 0.9.8g Hans-Christian Egtvedt
2008-08-13 3:24 ` Hamish Moffatt
2008-08-13 5:39 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
2008-09-11 11:58 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt [this message]
2008-09-11 13:06 ` Hamish Moffatt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080911135843.2c66d713@atmel.com \
--to=hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.