From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] netlink: fix overrun in attribute iteration
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 22:59:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080911205933.GA20032@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
>From ca63375e8ed91d73d0c2abd1cb64a8b022ce2af8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 22:37:13 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] netlink: fix overrun in attribute iteration
kmemcheck reported this:
kmemcheck: Caught 16-bit read from uninitialized memory (f6c1ba30)
0500110001508abf050010000500000002017300140000006f72672e66726565
i i i i i i i i i i i i i u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u
^
Pid: 3462, comm: wpa_supplicant Not tainted (2.6.27-rc3-00054-g6397ab9-dirty #13)
EIP: 0060:[<c05de64a>] EFLAGS: 00010296 CPU: 0
EIP is at nla_parse+0x5a/0xf0
EAX: 00000008 EBX: fffffffd ECX: c06f16c0 EDX: 00000005
ESI: 00000010 EDI: f6c1ba30 EBP: f6367c6c ESP: c0a11e88
DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
CR0: 8005003b CR2: f781cc84 CR3: 3632f000 CR4: 000006d0
DR0: c0ead9bc DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
DR6: ffff4ff0 DR7: 00000400
[<c05d4b23>] rtnl_setlink+0x63/0x130
[<c05d5f75>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x165/0x200
[<c05ddf66>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x76/0xa0
[<c05d5dfe>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x1e/0x30
[<c05dda21>] netlink_unicast+0x281/0x290
[<c05ddbe9>] netlink_sendmsg+0x1b9/0x2b0
[<c05beef2>] sock_sendmsg+0xd2/0x100
[<c05bf945>] sys_sendto+0xa5/0xd0
[<c05bf9a6>] sys_send+0x36/0x40
[<c05c03d6>] sys_socketcall+0x1e6/0x2c0
[<c020353b>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x3f
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
This is the line in nla_ok():
/**
* nla_ok - check if the netlink attribute fits into the remaining bytes
* @nla: netlink attribute
* @remaining: number of bytes remaining in attribute stream
*/
static inline int nla_ok(const struct nlattr *nla, int remaining)
{
return remaining >= sizeof(*nla) &&
nla->nla_len >= sizeof(*nla) &&
nla->nla_len <= remaining;
}
It turns out that remaining can become negative due to alignment in
nla_next(). But GCC promotes "remaining" to unsigned in the test
against sizeof(*nla) above. Therefore the test succeeds, and the
nla_for_each_attr() may access memory outside the received buffer.
A short example illustrating this point is here:
#include <stdio.h>
main(void)
{
printf("%d\n", -1 >= sizeof(int));
}
...which prints "1".
This patch adds a cast in front of the sizeof so that GCC will make
a signed comparison and fix the illegal memory dereference. With the
patch applied, there is no kmemcheck report.
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
---
include/net/netlink.h | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/netlink.h b/include/net/netlink.h
index 18024b8..208fe5a 100644
--- a/include/net/netlink.h
+++ b/include/net/netlink.h
@@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ static inline int nla_len(const struct nlattr *nla)
*/
static inline int nla_ok(const struct nlattr *nla, int remaining)
{
- return remaining >= sizeof(*nla) &&
+ return remaining >= (int) sizeof(*nla) &&
nla->nla_len >= sizeof(*nla) &&
nla->nla_len <= remaining;
}
--
1.5.5.1
next reply other threads:[~2008-09-11 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-11 20:59 Vegard Nossum [this message]
2008-09-11 22:04 ` [PATCH] netlink: fix overrun in attribute iteration David Miller
2008-09-12 0:35 ` Thomas Graf
2008-09-12 2:05 ` David Miller
2008-09-11 23:52 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-12 5:42 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-09-12 6:02 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-12 3:51 ` David Wagner
2008-09-12 5:49 ` Vegard Nossum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080911205933.GA20032@localhost.localdomain \
--to=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.