From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: Accessing the VNC using HVM stub domain - xen 3.3.0 Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:40:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20080911234012.GM5204@implementation> References: <20fe3cf60809110547s5e2f4ae4j64f92fed6b2b0898@mail.gmail.com> <20080911160028.GM4541@implementation.bordeaux.inria.fr> <20fe3cf60809111045h2d2a875ek49e5b1b76dc99637@mail.gmail.com> <20080911182439.GB5204@implementation> <20fe3cf60809111237o131dbb7fl6d226cd9425df990@mail.gmail.com> <20080911213634.GE5204@implementation> <20fe3cf60809111632vf9e5ee6w4cce2e089c15ff4@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20fe3cf60809111632vf9e5ee6w4cce2e089c15ff4@mail.gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Marco Sinhoreli Cc: xen-devel mailing list List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Marco Sinhoreli, le Thu 11 Sep 2008 20:32:31 -0300, a =E9crit : > >> In bonnie++ benchmark, the item "write block" is impressive: > >> ....................Per char........Block........Rewrite > >> stub-hvm .....20898..........41857.......21045 > >> hvm .............19046..........17462.......19331 > > > > Is that disk performance? > Yes, I=B4m using sata disks in this bench. I have servers with SAS but > this is in production. Ok. In my tests I was getting ~60MB/s in both case, the improvement was rather of the order of just 10% (just getting a bit closer to native). Samuel