From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755484AbYILMKk (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:10:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752739AbYILMKb (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:10:31 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:34794 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752477AbYILMKb (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:10:31 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:10:29 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Tomas M Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: advantages of AXFS over squashfs? Message-ID: <20080912121029.GA1166@infradead.org> References: <48CA386C.609@slax.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48CA386C.609@slax.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:37:48AM +0200, Tomas M wrote: > Hello. > > I read somewhere that AXFS is going to be a part of Linux kernel 2.6.28 > ( http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS6179099416.html?kc=rss ) It's been posted a single time, and only reviewed once. Unless we get another ten rcs for 2.6.27 it's highly unlikely that it'll make 2.6.28.