From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Baudis Subject: Re: CGit and repository list Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:20:37 +0200 Message-ID: <20080912162037.GC10360@machine.or.cz> References: <19449377.post@talk.nabble.com> <8c5c35580809120736x4170b2dbq3438bd619326ae00@mail.gmail.com> <20080912145804.GF10544@machine.or.cz> <200809121754.30277.jnareb@gmail.com> <20080912160538.GB10360@machine.or.cz> <20080912160854.GL22960@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jakub Narebski , Lars Hjemli , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Sep 12 18:21:53 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KeBP0-0000EN-LL for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:21:47 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753745AbYILQUj (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:20:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756902AbYILQUj (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:20:39 -0400 Received: from w241.dkm.cz ([62.24.88.241]:47604 "EHLO machine.or.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753745AbYILQUi (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:20:38 -0400 Received: by machine.or.cz (Postfix, from userid 2001) id 1BD0F393A36E; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:20:37 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080912160854.GL22960@spearce.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 09:08:54AM -0700, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > Petr Baudis wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 05:54:29PM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > > > > P.S. Could you please gather some statistics to compare the period > > > before and after installing "smart" HTTP server (and after smart > > > clients became widespread). > > > > What kind of statistics? > > Disk IO and network IO consumed probably. The kernel.org folks are > hoping the smart HTTP server can lower their loads a bit by being > more careful about what we send to the client. To check whether it actually matters for me, I have counted HTTP requests for info/refs: 42 per hour for the last 5.5 days. So it might. 28% of the requests are web crawlers. For objects/../, it is more fun - 1942 requests per hour. 46% is accounted for web crawlers. I will put up a robots.txt. ;-) -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis The next generation of interesting software will be done on the Macintosh, not the IBM PC. -- Bill Gates